MétaCan
Menu
← Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2271868148 · doi:10.18260/1-2--5253

A Middle School Project For Science And Math Enhancement Through Engineering

2020· article· en· W2271868148 sur OpenAlexaff
Karen High, Becky Hammack, Beth Watt, Julie Thomas, Adrienne Redmond, Pat Jordan, Jean Dockers

Notice bibliographique

Revuenon disponible
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineEngineering
ThématiqueEngineering Education and Pedagogy
Établissements canadiensStillwater (Canada)
Organismes subventionnairesOklahoma State UniversityConocoPhillips
Mots-clésMathematics educationComputer scienceScience and engineeringEngineeringMathematicsEngineering ethics

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Abstract NOTE: The first page of text has been automatically extracted and included below in lieu of an abstract A Middle School Project for Science and Math Enhancement through Engineering Abstract This study is focused on the impact of curricular and extra curricular engineering-based instructional activities on middle students’ perceptions of their ability to become engineers. Middle school students are at an age where high interest activities are essential for motivation and relevant learning. This is also the age where students’ interest can be piqued to consider careers in STEM fields. This study also looks at math content knowledge, attitudes toward math and science, and perceptions of technology, engineering, and what defines engineering. In 2007, the Stillwater Middle School received a $15,000 grant from the Stillwater Public Education Foundation to start an engineering program for sixth- and seventh-grade students. The grant allowed the middle school to partner with Oklahoma State University to develop a multi- faceted engineering program. Through this partnership between the middle school and local university, three primary instructors have developed, coordinated, and conducted the majority of the components of the program. The ideas and initiative behind the program were proposed and enacted by a chemical engineering professor at Oklahoma State University, who is also highly involved in the pre-service teacher program at the university as well as several engineering education initiatives at her university. She has partnered with two middle school science instructors to develop, fund, conduct, and expand the engineering program at the middle school. The Enriching Science and Math through Engineering project consists of the following three components for students with an embedded teacher professional development program for middle school teachers. A Curriculum Integration project has sixth and seventh grade core team teachers (math, science, social studies, and language arts) using existing and new integrated engineering modules during school. The new modules were developed by the teachers working with engineering and education professors. A Summer Camp is an engineering project based program for 6th and 7th grade students delivered by two science teachers with support from an engineering professor. An After School Mentoring Program that meets once a week for 45 sixth and seventh grade girls. The College of Engineering provided mentors to support the students in understanding engineering and to encourage them to consider engineering careers. Middle school students participate in engineering projects that were age appropriate and encouraged problem solving, creativity and collaborative learning, as well as meet professional engineering women. Seventh grade girls served as cross-age mentors for sixth grade girls in addition to the college level mentors. In 2007, the engineering professor was the lead for the project. In 2008, the two middle school science teachers are providing project leadership. A variety of instruments were administered to determine mathematics and science content knowledge changes, knowledge about engineering and technology and the impact the instructional activities had on overall student perceptions. Results have shown positive impact of the interventions.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,005
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Autre · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,021
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,070

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0050,002
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,001
Bibliométrie0,0020,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0080,002
Communication savante0,0040,002
Science ouverte0,0020,005
Intégrité de la recherche0,0020,004
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0210,004

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,060
Tête enseignante GPT0,289
Écart entre enseignants0,229 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreAutre

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations2
Publié2020
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même sujetEngineering Education and Pedagogy→Travaux en français237 207→