When Symptomatic Treatment Becomes Antitumor Treatment for Vipoma: Opportunity for Frail Elderly Adults
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
To the Editor: An 82-year-old woman was admitted to the emergency department because of a fall with head injury and loss of consciousness. Her hospital record revealed a history of untreated urinary incontinence, dyslipidemia, and hypertension. During the previous 6 weeks, she had had untreated profuse diarrhea (>10 watery stools per day), a 10-kg loss of weight, and severe asthenia. On examination, she showed evidence of delirium with fluctuating level of consciousness and disorientation, ophthalmic zoster lesions, and severe dehydration. Laboratory tests showed hypokalemia 1.5 mmol/L (normal range 3.5–5.0 mmol/L), hypercalcemia 3.2 mmol/L (normal range 2.2–2.6 mmol/L), and acute renal failure. Her electrocardiogram showed inverted T waves and ST depression. Fluid and electrolyte replacement urgently performed under cardiac monitoring led to partial improvement of her condition. Thoracoabdominal computed tomography was performed to investigate the profuse diarrhea and showed a 7-cm hypervascularized tumor in the tail of the pancreas, with nodes of peritoneal carcinomatosis and lesions in the liver and lungs, and a bilateral pulmonary embolism. Emergency physicians consulted the mobile geriatric team, and she was admitted to the geriatric ward, because it was best suited to provide the comprehensive care required. Anticoagulant therapy was initiated, and in consultation with gastroenterologists, short-acting octreotide (somatostatin analogue) 100 μg twice a day for symptomatic diarrhea was initiated, leading to dramatic improvement. To implement the best care plan, comprehensive geriatric assessment was performed 3 weeks after admission.1, 2 Of the 10 standard domains assessed, six were impaired: mild cognitive impairment, mobility and balance disturbance, activity of daily living impairment, malnutrition, and social isolation. It was decided to investigate further her pancreatic tumor to determine the best treatment. Computed tomography–guided needle biopsy of the pancreatic mass diagnosed a well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumor. Chromogranin A was 143 ng/mL (normal <85 ng/mL) and vasoactive intestinal peptide (VIP) was 157 ng/L (normal 23–63 ng/L). Indium-111-octreotide scintigraphy showed an isolated strong uptake in the tail of the pancreas. A potential diagnosis of metastatic VIPoma was reached. The institutional tumor board chose palliative care for this frail 82-year-old woman and decided to switch to a long-acting somatostatin analogue for its antisecretory and antitumor effects. She died 5 months later, before progression of the tumor could be assessed. VIPoma is a rare functional neuroendocrine tumor of the pancreas (pNET) that secretes VIP. Although VIPoma is rare (estimated incidence 0.05–0.2/1,000,000 individuals), the incidence of NET is rising and could be more common in elderly adults.3-5 The typical clinical features of VIPoma result from excessive secretion of VIP and include large-volume secretory diarrhea, hypokalemia, and dehydration.3 Somatostatin analogues, which inhibit the release of neuroendocrine hormones, control hormone-related symptoms in up to 70% to 90% of symptomatic pNETs.6 Forty percent to 95% of VIPomas are metastatic at presentation, and the symptoms related to excessive secretion of VIP are more likely to shorten life expectancy than tumor growth.7 Thus, management of these tumors in frail elderly adults requires collaboration between endocrinologists and geriatricians to weigh the pros and cons of each therapeutic option. Two new therapeutic options are worth mentioning. First, two targeted therapies everolimus and sunitinib, have recently been approved for treatment of progressive metastatic pNET, although no evidence of efficacy in older adults is available.8 Second, somatostatin analogues, which have an excellent tolerance profile, have been shown to have an antitumor effect: in retrospective studies, stabilizing up to 50% of 60% of NET, and in two randomized controlled trials of octreotide long-acting release in metastatic midgut NET and nonfunctioning gastroenteropancreatic NET.6, 9, 10 Somatostatin analogues are thus recommended for antiproliferative purposes in nonresectable, slowly progressive, low proliferative NET.6, 8 Even though there is no evidence of efficacy in older adults, somatostatin analogues have been used in elderly adults for their antisecretory effects and could be a nonaggressive alternative treatment for frail elderly adults. In conclusion, this case illustrates that multidisciplinary collaboration enabled the choice of adequate treatment for this frail elderly woman. Moreover, a well-known symptomatic treatment has been proven to have an antitumor effect, increasing the spectrum of treatment options in this population. Conflict of Interest: All the authors declare no conflict of interest. Author Contributions: All the authors met the ICMJE criteria to be considered as authors. Sponsor's Role: No sponsor.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,002 | 0,004 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».