Canada's New Consumer Product Legislation: A Shield or a Sword?
Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base
Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
This article originally appeared in the January 2011 Product Liability Committee Newsletter. Manufacturers, importers and retailers selling consumer products in Canada will soon experience a flurry of regulatory change. On December 15, 2010, the Parliament of Canada gave royal assent to Bill C-36, An Act respecting the safety of consumer to be known as the Canada Consumer Product Safety Act (CCPSA). CCPSA is awaiting proclamation in force. Once CCPSA is proclaimed in force, it will transform Health Canada into a weighty regulator of the consumer product supply chain, with powers akin to those of the Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) in the U.S. The stated goal of CCPSA is to strengthen and standardize the consumer product safety regime in Canada, which Health Canada--Canada's federal health authority---expects to achieve through: * a power to order recalls of consumer products * increased and onerous reporting responsibilities for the consumer products industry * a prosecution and penalty regime to compel compliance. The impetus for Bill C-36 was a series of high profile international recalls in 2007 and 2008 (including lead paint in children's toys and melamine in infant formula), which challenged the Canadian government to modernize its health and food product safety regime to deal with new economic realities, including products, technologies and increased global trade. For companies supplying Canadians with consumer products, the likely consequences will be not just increased regulation but also increased class action litigation. Plaintiffs undoubtedly will seek to take advantage of the self-reporting obligations to be imposed upon corporations plus the regulator-mandated recalls. Pre-CCPSA Regulatory Landscape The primary legislation governing consumer products in Canada since 1969 has been the Hazardous Products Act (HPA). But HPA is limited in scope and effect. It does not apply to all consumer products generally. Rather, it applies to only a limited number of consumer products. In addition to HPA, a few other statutes regulate specific products, such as the Canadian Food Inspection Agency Act (food), the Food and Drugs Act (food, drugs, medical devices and cosmetics), and the Motor Vehicle Safety Act (motor vehicles). Under HPA, Health Canada's mandate includes the regulation of: any product, material or substance that is or contains a poisonous, toxic, flammable, explosive, corrosive, infectious, oxidizing or reactive product ... (which) is or is likely to be a danger to the health and safety of the public; or any product designed for household, garden or personal use, for use in sports or recreational activities, as lifesaving equipment or as a toy, plaything or equipment for use by children... (which) is or is likely to be a danger to the health or safety of the public because of its design, construction or contents. In other words, the scope of HPA is limited to products that are considered to be inherently dangerous. CCPSA and Health Canada's New Powers CCPSA repeals and replaces Part I of HPA, and it applies to most consumer products generally, with only limited exceptions. As a result, a wide array of consumer products, not currently subject to detailed regulation, will be caught by this legislative regime. CCPSA contains several broad prohibitions that build upon the list of products restricted by HPA, which will shift the approach of consumer product regulation to an anticipatory position that is more consistent with the consumer product regulatory regime in the U.S. Increased Reporting Responsibilities CCPSA will impose on manufacturers, importers and sellers a duty to notify Health Canada, and the suppliers from whom each of them received the consumer product, of any incident with respect to a consumer product supplied in Canada. …
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,003 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle