MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2277001614 · doi:10.20361/g20k5d

Ecosystem Series: “Who Needs an Iceberg?”, “Who Needs a Jungle?”, “Who Needs a Swamp?” by K. Patkau

2012· article· en· W2277001614 sur OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Sandy Campbell

Notice bibliographique

RevueThe Deakin Review of Children s Literature · 2012
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineEnvironmental Science
ThématiquePolar Research and Ecology
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésJungleEcosystemSwampGlossaryGeographyEcologyArchaeologyBiology

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Patkau, Karen. Ecosystem Series: “Who Needs an Iceberg?”, “Who Needs a Jungle?”, “Who Needs a Swamp?”. 3 vols. Toronto: Tundra Books, 2012. Part of elementary public school science curriculum, at least in Alberta, for many years has included a study of ecosystems. Many publishers of children’s non-fiction have published series of ecosystem-specific books in support of these curricula. Toronto author/illustrator, Karen Patkau is a new voice in this field. Patkau has won many awards and citations for her illustrations and these books are further examples of her fine work. All three of these books follow a similar pattern. Illustrations make up most of the work. The language is appropriate to the upper elementary target audience. In each book, there are a few textbook-like illustrations of biological cycles, such as the oxygen cycle. At the end of each volume there is a world map that shows where in the world the kind of ecosystem being described can be found. An inset larger map shows the location of the specific ecosystem being illustrated in the book. The map is followed by a visual dictionary of twenty-four of the organisms described in the book with a paragraph describing each organism. Each book concludes with a glossary. “Who Needs an Iceberg? “ is miss-titled, because icebergs have much less impact on the Arctic ecosystems than does the presence of the swiftly-shrinking polar ice cap. However, through the book, Patkau does address most of the varied terrestrial and aquatic Arctic ecosystems. Her illustrations range from very detailed, for example the ptarmigan on the tundra, to the almost two-dimensional representation of the beluga. This is a non-fiction work, so Patkau’s representation of the underwater part of the iceberg as the face of an animal is a bit of an oddity. While “Who Needs an Iceberg?” barely mentions the iceberg through the text, “Who Needs a Jungle?” is completely about jungle environments. Patkau expertly portrays the dark jungle interiors and the bright and vibrant crowns. Her jungle is lush, with many shades of green and bright flowers and is filled with insects, birds, snakes and mammal. In the latter part of the book Patkau addresses how the jungle impacts global weather, air quality and regional water regimes. “Who Needs a Swamp?” focuses on a swamp in southern Georgia, in the southeastern United States. Given that part of the marketing for ecosystem series is the tie-in to the school curriculum, it seem as bit strange that Patkau would not have chosen a swamp in a Canadian environment, with which children might have some personal experience. While swamps wherever they are serve similar functions in trapping excess rainfall, slowing run-off and filtering water, Canadian children will not find armadillos, crocodiles, sassafras and cypress trees in their local swamps. Similar in presentation to “Who Needs a Jungle?” this book showcases Patkau’s portrayal of the lush world of a sub-tropical swamp. Because there have been several ecosystem series published for the Canadian environment in the past ten years, and not much changes in these ecosystems, for school libraries on small budgets, these books, particularly the one on swamps, would probably fall into the “nice to have” category. However, for any public or school library needing to buy new or having a budget large enough to accommodate duplication of subject content and peripheral content, these books are highly recommended. Highly recommended: 4 stars out of 4Reviewer: Sandy Campbell Sandy is a Health Sciences Librarian at the University of Alberta, who has written hundreds of book reviews across many disciplines. Sandy thinks that sharing books with children is one of the greatest gifts anyone can give.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Synthèse · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,128
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,429

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,000
Bibliométrie0,0010,002
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,001
Communication savante0,0040,004
Science ouverte0,0010,002
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,003
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,1280,088

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,006
Tête enseignante GPT0,241
Écart entre enseignants0,235 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreSynthèse

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2012
Routes d'admission2
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueThe Deakin Review of Children s LiteratureMême sujetPolar Research and EcologyTravaux en français237 207