MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2277012244 · doi:10.14288/1.0048557

Comparison of energy measurement methods in the standard penetration test : final report, appendices I, II, III, and IV

2013· article· en· W2277012244 sur OpenAlex

Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base

Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.

affAu moins un auteur déclare une institution canadienne dans l'instantané OpenAlex épinglé.

Notice bibliographique

RevuecIRcle (University of British Columbia) · 2013
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMaterials Science
ThématiqueEngineering and Material Science Research
Établissements canadiensUniversity of British Columbia
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésTest (biology)Computer scienceGeology

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Research sponsored by the US Bureau of Reclamation. The Standard Penetration Test (SPT) N-value is widely used in geotechnical engineering as a basis for foundation design and as the primary index of liquefaction resistance. The main factor affecting the N-value is the energy delivered to the rods by the hammer. As measured N-values are conventionally corrected to a standard energy level of 60% of the standard potential energy, it is necessary to measure the energy input. Research into the measurement of energy during SPT testing has been conducted since the 1970s. The early work was based on measurement of the force time history alone (F² method). In recent years, the Force-Velocity (FV) method) has been suggested to be superior to the F² method. It requires the measurement of acceleration in addition to force, with velocity determined by integration of the acceleration. As the values of energy obtained by the F² and FV approaches are often different, this research project was conducted to investigate the reasons for such differences and to develop recommendations for equipment, instrumentation and testing procedures, which would allow more accurate and consistent energy measurements in SPT. The work consisted of review of available energy measurement data, laboratory study of the energy transfer process and of the performance of the individual components of energy measurement systems and full-scale measurements under controlled conditions in the laboratory and in the field. The experimental work was carried out in conjunction with numerical modelling of the energy transfer process. The work confirmed that the FV method is the only consistent approach for measurement of stress wave energy transmitted from the hammer to the rod and sampler system in SPT testing. It is relatively straightforward to obtain reliable measurements of force time history but reliable determinations of the velocity time history are more challenging. A rigidly mounted 20,000g accelerometer in conjunction with a data acquisition system capable of sampling the acceleration signal at over 100 kHz was shown to result in high quality stress wave energy data. Both digital and analog integration of acceleration were found to give comparable velocity time histories provided attention was paid to compatibility of all mechanical and electronic components of the measurement system. Based on the experimental and analytical work, the UBC energy measurement research system was upgraded and limited field trials were carried out. The field trials also permitted some comparisons to results from a commercially available energy measurement system. With any system, reliable energy measurements require rigorous data quality assessment in the field by qualified personnel with an understanding of wave mechanics. Guidelines for such assessments are provided in the report. A simple field apparatus and test procedure capable of transmitting a reproducible impulse wave is proposed to allow the operator to check that the instrumentation is functioning properly. Finally, recommendations are provided for instrumentation and procedures that will allow reliable measurement of energy in the field.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,002
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,979
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,916

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0020,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,037
Tête enseignante GPT0,279
Écart entre enseignants0,242 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle