Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Throughout the common law countries studies and investigations have been carried out to reform the procedure used by administrative tribunals. The procedural rules to which, tribunals in British. Columbia must adhere are found in the common law rules of natural justice and in the tribunals' establishing statutes. This system has been severely criticized as it is inconsistent and unpredictable. There is no consensus amongst the common law jurisdictions as to which solution to the problem of procedural safeguards in the administrative process is most preferable. The competing interests; protection of the public from unfair government actions, and the efficiency of the administration, are the reasons for this lack of consensus. It is the thesis of this essay that procedural reform is needed in British Columbia. Therefore, British Columbia would benefit from a minimum administrative procedure act applicable to all administrative tribunals' adjudicative functions. The method used to establish this thesis was to research the present situation in British Columbia. As a background to this, a description of the common law rules of natural justice and a study of the procedural rules of three provincial tribunals enacted by the Legislature are given. This essay continues with a description of the solutions used in Ontario and in the United States where minimum procedure rules have been enacted, applicable, to most administrative tribunals. After considering these different solutions, along with, the investigations of law reform reports from various common law jurisdictions, it has been concluded that certain fundamental procedural safeguards should be enacted by way of an administrative procedure act. The main argument for this is that such, an act would serve an educational purpose by informing both, administrators and the public of the procedural rules. As the suggested procedural rules are very fundamental, it is also concluded that it is necessary to carry out further investigations into each tribunal. In this way, more detailed procedural rules could be enacted, applicable to a specific tribunal, if deemed, necessary. In summary, the conclusion of this thesis is that a minimum administrative procedure act will fill an educational purpose and, at the same time, might help to achieve a more consistent, predictable administration with regard to procedure. It might also work as a catalyst by promoting further studies into the procedural aspect of the administrative process.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».