MétaCan
Menu
← Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2278585876 · doi:10.14288/1.0055133

A Study of training programs for Native Indian Teaching Assistants with emphasis on the program at Lytton, B.C.

2010· article· en· W2278585876 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Judith Anne Stringer

Notice bibliographique

RevuecIRcle (University of British Columbia) · 2010
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueEducation Systems and Policy
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésTraining (meteorology)Emphasis (telecommunications)Medical educationComputer sciencePedagogyPsychologyMedicineGeographyTelecommunications

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

This study was started after the writer attended a workshop in Lytton at which the teachers and the Native Indian Teaching Assistants examined their roles in a new and developing program designed to improve the performance of Indian students in schools by providing Indian adults as role models and as cultural bridges between Indian life and white middle class schools. The writer had been working with teacher aides in multicultural classrooms for seven years outside of Canada and wished to observe similarities and differences in training programs and in acceptance patterns of teacher aides or teaching assistants by school teachers and the school systems. The study has two parts: 1) a review of the literature on Indian Education, the Training of Native Indian Teachers and the Training of Native Indian Teaching Assistants, and 2) the Teaching Assistant Training Program program in Lytton. As the literature of the training of Native Indian Teaching Assistants was sparse, the literature on the training of teacher aides and teaching assistants in multicultural classrooms and on the New Careers for the Poor Movement of the late sixties was correlated with the available material from Native Indian Teaching Assistant Training programs. Components from programs that were judged helpful, successful or necessary by program participants and researchers were assembled and compared. The Lytton program was followed for two years in irregularly spaced visits. Results from structured interviews, questionnaires, and observations made while leading inservice sessions, and doing document study were compiled. Programs designed to train teacher aides or teaching assistants were found to be remarkably similar across North America from 1968-1983. A mini-teacher education course was usually given to the trainees even though in most programs the teaching assistant assumes clerical or tutorial roles. Very little has been attempted in training sessions to enhance the infusion of different cultural norms in learning styles or behaviors into the traditional middle class North American school systems. Although most studies have concluded that the teachers who work with teaching assistants require training and supervision in order to help them learn new roles and teaming skills, few programs had the resources to retrain teachers. The political nature of school change has been underplayed by the people attempting to increase the presence of Indian adults in the schools. The necessity for a wide and effective communication network in the community to gain and retain support for new programs has been ignored, sometimes deliberately, but ever with peril. Those groups in the community that feel they are being bypassed are able to stop or change programs before they achieve their desired results. The introduction of the study of Indian languages and artifacts to the curriculum of schools with large Indian student populations has begun. The study of Indian foods, art, music and dance has been organized in many communities. The deeper culture of attitudes, consideration of others, relationships with the environment and modes of learning have yet to be studied and implemented.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,005
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,013
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Qualitatif · Signal consensuel: Qualitatif
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,915
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,169

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0050,013
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0010,002
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0100,002
Communication savante0,0030,001
Science ouverte0,0020,001
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,003
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0020,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,041
Tête enseignante GPT0,291
Écart entre enseignants0,250 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeQualitatif
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2010
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revuecIRcle (University of British Columbia)→Même sujetEducation Systems and Policy→Travaux en français237 207→