Правовое регулирование лоббистской деятельности: канадские подходы
Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base
Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Resistance and counteraction to bureaucracy corruption is one of directions of government reform. It is complex work having many aspects. It embraces different ingredients of state policy each of which needs close considering and comprehensive discussing. In this respect researching such a phenomenon as lobbyism, which is being much discussed nowadays, is of great interest. Different opinions have been expressed on necessity to work out project Lobbying Law, its content, including legal norms to prevent a conflict of interests, caused by lobbyists' activity. Serious attention is being paid to Canadian practice of legal provision and control of lobbyists' activity in connection with Russian-Canadian project on promoting State Government Reforms in Russian Federation. Some materials of project were used to write this article. Basing on analysis of data and information given in article, author makes following conclusions: 1. As it follows from the National Plan of Counteracting to Bureaucracy Corruption, Normative Legal regulating lobbyist activity in R.F. should take into account interests of political parties, social groups, juridical and physical persons, when Federal Acts or Acts of subjects of Russian Federation or some other normative acts may be made. To use this approach in practice, considering that it is quite new and innovative to Russian Legal System, is necessary to study existing practice of controlling and managing lobbyist activity. 2. Different suggestions on developing Federal regulation of lobbying act, including suggestions how corruption should be defeated, need comprehensive assessing, with foreign experience being thoroughly analyzed and used. 3. The major principles of Canadian Lobbying Acts are as follows: operation of a single common registration system for both business lobbyists and nonprofit organizations lobbyists. lobbyists are obliged to make reports of all money received and paid by them for purpose of influencing legislation on basis of free and open access to government offices. The purpose of Regulation Lobbying Act implementation is to inform large public about names and aims of those who seek to influence government authorities. For this purpose Public Registry System which exists in Canada requires lobbyists (in each lobbying case) to register with clerk of House and secretary of Senate to state names and addresses of persons employing them and amount of salary and expense they receive. What lobbyists are to do is defined by undertaking on basis of a contract or agreement either in written or oral form. All in all, main task of Lobbying Legislation is to provide public at large with information about open, transparent activity of lobbyists and to prevent conflicts of interests between government officials who are influenced by lobbyists. 4. The fact that Canada elaborates and considers mentioned in article legislation proposals on making demands to lobbyists tougher proves that civil society in country regards existing laws and their implementation in field of lobbyism with some doubt. This should be taken into account when conceptual provisions of fundamentally new Russian lobbying legislation are worked out.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,003 | 0,002 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,003 | 0,003 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,003 | 0,002 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,005 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,007 | 0,005 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,003 |
| Science ouverte | 0,005 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,003 | 0,003 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,019 | 0,028 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle