Experimental Fuzzy Modelling and Control of a Steam Power Plant Boiler
Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base
Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
AbstractIncreasing the use of electricity and the need for more and safer power generation has motivated investigation into new control methods resulting in better performance. Better system performance means increase in power generation efficiency, also decrease in the maintenance costs. To design suitable controllers, adequate information about the system dynamics is required, which in turn has motivated the methods of system identification and simulation studies of power plants. In this paper, simple first-order models are developed for the subsystems of a subcritical once-through boiler, based on the principles of thermodynamics and energy—mass balance, together with parameter estimation routines. These routines are applied on the experimental data obtained from a complete set of field experiments. However, since most processes in a boiler are categorized as multi-input and multi-output systems, mathematical boiler models, which are derived from physical structure and parameters estimation routines, lead to a time-consuming procedure, and employing such models in control algorithms becomes very complex. Therefore, to improve the dynamics modelling, a concise multilayer neuro fuzzy model of the boiler is developed. Next, these two models are compared based on the performance of the real system. This comparison validates the accuracy of both original and neuro fuzzy models, while the latter can be successfully employed in simulation studies, and to design modern model-based control systems. Finally, a new Fuzzy P2 ID controller is developed to use for superheaters temperature control. Simulation results show very good performance of this controller in terms of more accurate and less fluctuation in the temperature of corresponding subsystems, compared to the existing classic controllers.Key Words: Simulationdynamic modellingsystem identificationfuzzy logicboiler control Additional informationNotes on contributorsA. ChaibakhshAli Chaibakhsh received his B.Sc. degree in 2002 from Gilan University, and his M.Sc. degree in 2004 from K.N. Toosi University of Technology, both in Mechanical Engineering. He is a Ph.D. student at the Department of Mechanical Engineering at the K.N. Toosi University of Technology. His thesis subject has been in the areas of modelling, and control of steam power plants.S.A.A. MoosavianS. Ali A. Moosavian received his B.Sc. degree in 1986 from Sharif University of Technology and his M.Sc. degree in 1990 from Tarbiat Modaress University (both in Tehran), and his Ph.D. degree in 1996 from McGill University (Montreal, Canada), all in Mechanical Engineering. He is an Associate Professor at the Department of Mechanical Engineering at the K.N. Toosi University of Technology (Tehran) since 1997. He teaches courses in the areas of robotics, dynamics, automatic control, analysis and synthesis of mechanisms. His research interests are in the areas of dynamics modelling, and motion/impedance control of terrestrial and space robotic systems. He has published more than 100 articles in journals and conference proceedings. He is one of the founders of the ARAS Research Center for Design, Manufacturing and Control of Robotic Systems, and Automatic Machineries.A. GhaffariAli Ghaffari received his B.Sc. degree in 1970 from Sharif University of Technology (in Tehran), M.Sc. degree in 1974 from Georgia Tech., and his Ph.D. degree in 1978 from Berkeley, all in Mechanical Engineering. He is a Professor with the Department of Mechanical Engineering at the K.N. Toosi University of Technology (Tehran) since 1987. He teaches courses in the areas of automatic control, advanced and fuzzy control. His research interests are in the areas of control systems and biomechanics. He is one of the founders of the ARAS Research Center for Design, Manufacturing and Control of Robotic Systems, and Automatic Machineries.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle