Cardiovascular risk factors of first degree relatives with family history of premature atherosclerotic disease
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
The presence of premature (men <50 years; women <60 years) coronary heart disease (CHD) in a first-degree relative is a significant and independent risk factor for cardiovascular, peripheral vascular and cerebrovascular disease. First-degree relatives (FDRs) of patients with premature CHD (index patients) have increased risk of death from cardiovascular disease compared to those without a family history. The purpose of this study was to determine whether FDRs had higher prevalence and severity of traditional and non-traditional cardiovascular risk factors compared to the general Canadian population. Index patients and their FDRs (parents, siblings, and children) were recruited for the Family Atherosclerosis Counseling and Testing Study (FACTS). Cardiovascular risk assessment included measurements of lipid and biochemical markers, sociodemographic factors, anthropometry measures, as well as dietary, exercise, and smoking histories. Cardiovascular risk factors in FDRs were compared to a case-matched M-CHAT (Multicultural Community Health Assessment Trial) control population. Male index patients had significantly higher median values of body-mass-index (BMI; p = 0.002), waist circumference (p <0.001), systolic blood pressure (p = 0.026) and diastolic blood pressure (p = 0.001) than male FDRs. Median lipoprotein(a) values were higher in male index patients than their male FDRs (p = 0.014); no differences were observed between female index patients and female FDRs (p = 0.238). Though both groups were comparable in age (p = 0.130), FDR siblings had similar risk factors as index patients, except more FDR siblings were non smokers {p = 0.048) and FDR siblings were more educated (p = 0.044). Index patients and their FDR siblings had comparable median lipoprotein(a) values at 176 mg/L (102 - 476 mg/L) and 182 mg/L (59 - 474 mg/L), respectively (p = 0.516). Also, there was a higher prevalence of abdominal obesity in F DR siblings than in the index patients, which did not reach statistical significance. In general, FDRs had similar prevalence and severity of traditional lifestyle habits and cardiovascular risk factors as the M - C H A T controls. Both the FDRs and the controls were relatively healthy: over 92% of the female and 85% of the male FDRs were classified as 'lowrisk' according to the Framingham risk score, even after adjusting for positive family history., However, there were distinct differences between FDRs and controls in the frequency of elevated non-traditional risk factors, even after adjusting for age. Median lipoprotein(a) values were comparable between female FDRs at 218 (63 - 483) mg/L and female controls at 177 (96 - 270) mg/L (p - 0.331). Male FDRs, on the other hand, had significantly lower lipoprotein(a) than male controls at 105 (45 - 238) mg/L and 192 (88 - 377) mg/L, respectively (p = 0.022). Mean serum homocysteine levels were higher in both male and female FDRs at 10.9 ± 0.5 plM and 9.0 ± 0.3 |JM, compared to 8.5 ± 0.2 \xM and 7.3 ± 0.2 \xM for male and female controls, respectively (p <0.001). Mean C-reactive protein values were 1.8 ± 0.2 mg/L in male and 2.5 ± 0.2 mg/L in female FDRs; they did not differ significantly from the controls at 1.7 ± 0.3 mg/L for men and 1.7 ± 0.3 mg/L for women (p = 0.272).
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,002 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,003 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».