Evolution of porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus (PRRSV) is one of the leading swine pathogens causing tremendous economic loss to the global swine industry. Since its recognition in the late 1980s, PRRSV has continued to expand in genetic diversity which poses problems for management and eradication. As a result, tracing and tracking the evolving diversity of PRRSV is critical to all stakeholders. In 2010, a phylogenetic framework was proposed to classify all type 2 PRRSV ORF5 sequences (n ≈ 8,000). Since then a further build-up of sequences (n ≈ 5,000) prompted questions on the robustness of the 2010 system in typing new sequences and what new insights on PRRSV diversity could be gauged. \nPhylogenetic classification of new sequences did not lead to the discovery of new evolutionary lineages but enriched the diversity of existing lineages. Importantly, lineages 1 and 9 revealed widening divergence of PRRSV isolates over time with genetic distance peaking at ≥ 10% at present. The growing genetic disparity between viruses and commercial vaccines over time was equally evident. Seven out of the nine lineages had evolutionary origins in North America while the remaining two originated from East Asia. Lineages 1, 5, 8, and 9 viruses were the dominant circulating strains in the field, accounting for > 97% of the dataset. The USA was the country most impacted from the circulation of a diverse set of viruses with isolation of strains of almost every lineage. However, Canada exhibited the greatest heterogeneity in viral diversity despite having rarely experienced foreign introductions. Asian countries also displayed significant diversity but the burden of type 2 PRRSV in Europe was limited. While intra-country diversity levels were more or less comparable across the USA, the same was highly skewed among Canadian provinces. Overall, the inferred burden of vaccine-related viruses on circulating strains was approximately 5%. \nTo date, the majority of PRRSV diversity studies have focused on limited regions of the genome which incompletely characterize evolutionary mechanisms shaping the viral genome as a whole. A methodology of sequencing near complete-length PRRSV genomes was developed to obtain genomic sequences of a diverse set of 16 Hong Kong isolates. Genome assemblies and phylogenetic typing indicated the co-circulation of strains of both genotypes (type 1and type 2) with varying Nsp2 deletion patterns and distinct evolutionary lineages ("High Fever"-like and local endemic type). Recombination analyses revealed genomic breakpoints in structural and non-structural regions of genomes of both genotypes with evidence of many recombination events originating from common ancestors. Additionally, the high fold of coverage per nucleotide allowed the characterization of minor variants arising from the intra-strain heterogeneity. Overall, 0.56-2.83% of sites were polymorphic with respect to cognate consensus genomes. The distribution of minor variants across each genome was not uniform, indicating the influence of selective forces. The proportion of variants causing an amino acid change in their respective codons ranged between 25-67% with many predicted to be non-deleterious. Low frequency deletion variants were also detected, providing one possible mechanism for their sudden emergence as cited in previous reports.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».