MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2285538757 · doi:10.1155/2016/9075924

New Horizons in Diabetology

2016· editorial· en· W2285538757 sur OpenAlex
Ali Tootee, Garth L. Warnock, Aziz Ghahari, Bagher Larijani

Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base

Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.

affAu moins un auteur déclare une institution canadienne dans l'instantané OpenAlex épinglé.

Notice bibliographique

RevueJournal of Diabetes Research · 2016
Typeeditorial
Langueen
DomaineBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
ThématiqueBiological Research and Disease Studies
Établissements canadiensVancouver General HospitalUniversity of British Columbia
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésDiabetologyNew horizonsMedicineDiabetes mellitusEngineeringEndocrinologyAerospace engineering

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

The prevalence of diabetes has alarmingly increased in both developed and developing countries all across the world in the recent years. The prevalence of different complications and comorbid conditions associated with diabetes is also rampantly increasing, thereby negatively affecting lives of many people. In fact, obesity which is associated with diabetes is considered as a major public health concern in many countries. Nevertheless, it can be argued that still more progress is to be made in different fields of prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of diabetes. This gap in the science of Diabetology, arguably, stems from insufficient synchronized interdisciplinary basic and clinical research in the field. This deficiency may be addressed through finding the gaps in the published literature by means of plotting different diabetes maps and focusing research on them to promote the concept of translational medicine. Lack of comprehensive diabetes research maps and the scarcity of the literature in the related interdisciplinary fields can be considered as major hindrance to the future advancement of the science of Diabetology. With this view, we conceived the concept of publication of a special issue on the subject and invited authors to submit any original research or review paper with the potential of opening new horizons to prevention, screening, and treatment of diabetes. Out of approximately 50 manuscripts submitted, in this special issue, 15 articles have been approved by reviewers to be published on a wide range of relevant basic and clinical subjects. In the field of screening for diabetes, findings of a study by S. M. Joyce-Tan et al. demonstrated that genetic variants of the RAS can modestly influence the risk of type 2 diabetes. P. Haghvirdizadeh et al., in a different study, reported that R219K polymorphism of ABCA1 gene could be considered as a genetic risk factor for type 2 diabetes among certain populations. In another article, M. Khodaeian et al. assert that genome wide association studies on large number of samples can be helpful in the identification of diabetes susceptible genes and may be used as an alternative to studying individual candidate genes which is a time-consuming and expensive method. In a different article, P. Haghvirdizadeh et al. findings provide evidence for the contribution of common KCNJ11 genetic variants to the development of DM. In regard to the underlying mechanisms of diabetes and its complications, M. Kaplar et al., in an original research article, demonstrated a dual role for mannose binding lecithin as a risk factor for carotid intima media thickness in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. N. Bertoncello et al., in another article, shed some light on the complex underlying mechanisms involved in the development of diabetic nephropathy. As for novel diagnostic, preventive, and therapeutic options for diabetes, T. Mizushige showed that urinary angiotensinogen could be a prognostic marker of renoprotective effects of alogliptin in patients with type 2 diabetes. Findings of a study by R. Diez-Laiz demonstrate significant therapeutic potentials for Plantago ovata husk as an oral antihyperglycemic agent for treatment of type 2 diabetes. An article by M. S. Klein and J. Shearer argues that metabolomics has the potential to enable informed decision-making in the realm of personalized medicine. S. J. Hashemian et al., in a comprehensive review article, claim that despite all unresolved concerns about clinical applications of mesenchymal stem cells, this group of stem cells still remains a promising therapeutic modality for treatment of diabetes. A study by K. Kurek et al. demonstrates that myriocin can find potential future application as a therapeutic agent for the reduction of insulin resistance and its serious consequences in obese patients. Findings of S. Wang et al. study show that certain renoprotective therapeutic agents which can specifically abolish CTGF CCN2 expression, or nonspecifically inhibit CTGF CCN2 expression, may be protective against the development and progression of diabetes nephropathy. P. Senesi et al., in their study, demonstrate that metformin treatment can prevent sedentariness related damage in mice. In this regard, in another study by M. Bo et al., it is asserted that an inappropriate and aggressive glucose lowering therapeutic approach in frail and vulnerable elderly residents of long-term care facilities can adversely affect their health. It can be concluded that this special issue provides a series of original and review articles on a wide range of diabetes-related subjects which can assist researchers to design and carry out research projects in similar directions in the future. Moreover, this issue may be helpful in spotting current gaps in the science of Diabetology and facilitate focusing more research on them. We hope that the present special issue provides useful information for a superior understanding of the underlying mechanisms involved in the pathogenesis of diabetes as well as novel diagnostic and therapeutic techniques for the diseases.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,003
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,020
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesMétarecherche
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Éditorial · Signal consensuel: Éditorial
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,196
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,988

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0030,020
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,000
Bibliométrie0,0010,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0010,001
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,002
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,025
Tête enseignante GPT0,389
Écart entre enseignants0,364 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle