Patterns of care and outcomes of locally advanced breast cancer at the Cancer Centre of Southeastern Ontario
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
e11614 Background: Preoperative chemotherapy (PCT) is the standard of care for locally advanced breast cancer (LABC). As part of a multicentre provincial initiative we undertook a review of practice patterns and outcomes for women with LABC at our institution. Methods: We reviewed electronic and paper records for M0 pts receiving PCT for LABC between 1995–2007 at our institution, collecting demographic, disease and treatment-related, and outcome variables. Results: Sixty pts with LABC who received PCT were included in this review. Median age was 54y (31–80), 38% premenopausal. Median BMI was 28kg/m2, 78% were overweight or obese. Stage distribution: 10% IIB, 11% IIIA, 77% IIIB and 2% IIIC, of which 45% had inflammatory breast cancer (IBC). At biopsy 90% were invasive ductal carcinoma, 36% were ER and PR(-) and 25% were her2(+). Median time from surgical consultation to PCT was 22d (6–126). PCT was anthracycline-based alone in 85% of pts, 8% received a taxane, 3% also received preop endocrine therapy (ET), no pts received trastuzumab (T) preop. Pts received a median of 6 (3–8) cycles of PCT. Local therapy: mastectomy (M) in 82% of pts and partial M in 11%. Axillary surgery was done in only 92% of pts (axillary node dissection 90%, sentinel node biopsy 1pt) and 7% had no definitive breast or axillary surgery due to local progression (3) or refusal (1). All pts received radiotherapy. Postop systemic therapy: CT in 5% of pts, ET in 65% and T in 10% of pts. Clinical complete response (CR) rate was 28%. At definitive surgery 10% of pts had no residual disease in breast or axilla and 3 pts had only DCIS present, for a pathologic (p)CR rate of 15% using MDACC criteria. Median follow-up was 24mo (1–238). Median 5y DFS was not reached for the entire population and those with a pCR vs. 26mo for pts with IBC; corresponding 5y DFS rates were 58%, 78%, and 41% respectively. Median 5y OS was for the entire population was 52mo vs. 48mo for pts with a pCR and 47mo in the IBC group; corresponding 5y OS rates were 62%, 78% and 44% respectively. Conclusions: Management of LABC in our cohort is fairly uniform and consistent with current guidelines. Local outcomes of LABC managed with PCT are in keeping with the published literature and arguably better since almost half of our cohort is represented by IBC which carries a worse prognosis. No significant financial relationships to disclose.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,003 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,004 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,003 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».