Notice bibliographique
Résumé
During the Korean War(1950∼1953), the tank was a decisive weapon system which dominated the battle field. The T-34 tank conducted decisive role as to drive the Republic of Korea (ROK)and the United States(US) into the Line of defense, Nakdong River. On the other hand, during the counter-attack, the US Forces tank troops seized the initiative. And then the situation was changed when the Chinese Communist (CCF) engaged. In that time, there were approximately 2,000 tanks of diverse model of 7 countries, the North Korean People Army (NKPA), US, United Kingdom, CCF, Canada, Philippine and ROK. Especially, the CCF operated approximately 400 tanks with 2 tank divisions. And interesting because we normally regarded that they had used socalled human-wave tactics. The ROK Armed operated approximately 220 tanks with 3 tank battalions in 1953. Making and addition, the ROK Armed didnt have any tank in 1950. But the NKPA had more than 150 tanks with 1 tank Brigade and 1 tank regiment. They attached the tank troops to the infantry division in order to operate tank troops by the axis. The NKPA obtained great success by dispersing. But Basil Liddell Hart said If the NKPA operated its tank troops in concentrating form like Heinz Guderian did in 1940. they could had dominated the Korean Peninsula before the ROK and US secured the Line of Defense, Nakdong River. And then, as the US begun the counter-attack operation, their tank troops could dominate the battle field. They also operated tank troops in dispersing form. But it is worthy of notice that they came up with various operating model of the counter-attack, link-up operation, covering operation, withdrawal, reconnaissancein force, surprise attack which had been useful in the terrain of Korean Peninsula. Especially, the way of task organizing the infantry, tank and artillery units is the original form of the modern armed forces operation. In the Korean war, the tank took a role of amain actor. Some students of military artsay that in the terrain of Korean Peninsula, tank is not appropriate one. But not true. The analysis on the Korean War shows the tank conducted main role as to overcome terrain and swayed the direction of war finally. Thats the reason why many countries started to develop and improvea new type tank after the Korean War. The NKPA and ROK tried to promote the tank troops also. It has a influence both physical and psychological power. From old time,the battle field condition had been changing. We should prepare new operating conception for the future operational environment. We should consider our battle reality like a limited battle space, high density of deployment, powerful obstacles. And we pursuit change and challenge. The Korean War is a treasure house of the military doctrine. Thereare new trends of the Korean War study because confidential material of the USSR and CCF has been opening to the public. But the study on the role of tank is still in sufficient. I hope this study could be helpful to make clear the historical fact. The tank was the key factor to understand the Korean War.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,003 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,004 | 0,002 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,237 | 0,102 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».