MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2286974438 · doi:10.1002/ejhf.498

Henry Krum, Pioneering Heart Failure Researcher

2016· article· en· W2286974438 sur OpenAlexaff
Richard E. Gilbert, Frank Ruschitzka

Notice bibliographique

RevueEuropean Journal of Heart Failure · 2016
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueCardiovascular Health and Risk Factors
Établissements canadiensSt. Michael's HospitalUniversity of Toronto
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésMedicineWishful thinkingTrial by ordealLawPolitical sciencePsychology

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Professor Henry Krum, a physician-scientist and world authority on heart failure, best known for his innovation and leadership in clinical trials, died on 28 November 2015 in Melbourne. He was 57. The cause of death was neuroendocrine cancer. Krum was born in Melbourne, the son of Polish Jewish refugees who fled the devastations of Europe after the Second World War. While maintaining a life-long interest in journalism, Krum's love of science and medicine took prominence when he began studying medicine at Melbourne University in 1976. Following his training as a clinical pharmacologist and completing a PhD at the Austin Hospital, Krum undertook a 2-year post-doctoral fellowship at Columbia Presbyterian Medical Centre in New York under the tutelage of Milton Packer before returning to Melbourne to launch an independent academic career. Armed with new know-how on the conduct of large-scale clinical trials in heart failure, Krum, in a series of pivotal studies with international collaborators, began helping to engineer the about-face in medical practice that turned beta-blockers from contraindication to a fundamental tenet of evidence-based practice. Krum embraced the clinical trial process. He found enormous satisfaction in being able to trump convention, myth, and wishful thinking with fact, cherishing the international camaraderie engendered by a common purpose of trying to improve the lot of those living with heart failure. On the international steering committees of scores of clinical trials, it was hard to keep up with Krum's trajectory. Not a year went by without landmark publications in the top tier of medical journals, the awarding of PhDs to new trainees in heart failure research, continuing grant funding from the National Health and Medical Research Council, and the immense productivity of the Monash Centre of Cardiovascular Research and Education in Therapeutics that he founded and led. In 2014, he was credited by The Lancet, ‘to have put Australia on the map with respect to clinical trials in cardiovascular disease, particularly in heart failure’. In August 2015, Krum was placed in Thomson Reuters Highly Cited Researcher list, recognizing him as one of the world's most influential scientific minds with exceptional impact in his subject field. Refusing to be pigeon-holed as a purely clinical researcher, Krum remained deeply committed to the process of discovery medicine, maintaining his involvement in fundamental laboratory research and co-founding a successful biotechnology company. Reflecting the breadth of his understanding of the pathogenetic process, he viewed the cardiac-centred view of heart failure as incomplete, exploring, very much ahead of his time, its inter-relationship with diabetes and kidney disease, the implications of which are only now coming to be fully appreciated. For Krum, with his background in studying the role of autonomic dysfunction in blood pressure regulation, the implications of catheter-based renal denervation were immediately apparent as he led the first major, international proof-of-principle, safety and efficacy studies of this new technology. Though widely known for his medical research, Krum was a man with diverse interests that included literature, film, sports, art, and jazz. As with medicine, he pursued everything he did with fervent passion. Seeing him stifle a yawn at work may have meant that his flight from abroad had arrived earlier the same day or that his slumber had been punctuated by a midnight teleconference with the USA. It could, however, just as easily have meant a 3:00 am soccer match, if his beloved Liverpool FC, ‘The Reds’, were playing. Modest to the core, Krum downplayed his significant achievements, adopting a self-deprecating wit that would see him comparing his life with a Woody Allen film or Seinfeld episode. Above all, Krum was a family man who never let his prolific work life overshadow his commitment to his wife and two children. In 2012, Krum was diagnosed with pancreatic neuroendocrine cancer. Given a truly dismal prognosis by his treating oncologist, Henry's medical friends, following his example of challenging prevailing norms, set about scouring the medical literature in search of new potential treatments. As luck would have it, a major study had just shown that the mTOR inhibitor, everolimus, significantly prolonged progression-free survival among patients with advanced disease. Though patients with high-grade tumours such as Krum were not included in the trial, other studies indicated that such malignancies continued to express mTOR abundantly. Accordingly, Krum's medical friends reasoned that his cancer might also respond to the treatment. So, Krum enjoyed a 2-year reprieve, during which time he returned to business as usual; writing papers, speaking at international conferences, applying for grants, and continuing in his role as global PI and Executive Committee Chair of the 7000 patient ATMOSPHERE study of direct renin inhibition. It seemed that nothing could stop this remarkable man until things took a sharp turn for the worse in early 2015, when the cancer became rampant. Henry is survived by his wife of 26 years, artist, Lauren Berkowitz, their two children, Joshua and Emily, and sister, Sharon, a New York-based writer.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,003
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,177
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,774

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0030,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,001
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,001

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,021
Tête enseignante GPT0,277
Écart entre enseignants0,257 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2016
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueEuropean Journal of Heart FailureMême sujetCardiovascular Health and Risk FactorsTravaux en français237 207