Gaining a better understanding of how Outward Bound Western Canada course outcomes are achieved : a research study /
Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base
Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
This study examined how Outward Bound Western Canada (OBWC) course \noutcomes are achieved by exploring the relationships among course components, \nstudents' characteristics, and course outcomes. OBWC is a wilderness-based \nadventure education organization that helps students achieve outcomes such as \nincreased self-awareness, self-confidence, motivation, interpersonal skills, concern for \nothers, and concern for the environment. This study explored the ways in which the \nvarious components of courses and the characteristics of students contribute to \ndetermining the outcomes students experience as a result of their courses. The purpose \nof the study was to gain a better understanding of how OBWC course outcomes are \nachieved in order to strengthen adventure education theory, enhance practice at \nOBWC and other adventure education organizations, and provide a foundation for \nfurther research on this topic. \nAs an interpretive case study, this study sought to describe how OBWC course \noutcomes are achieved and to provide interpretations of the research findings. Data \nwas gathered from OBWC students and instructors using the quantitative and \nqualitative data collection techniques of questionnaire, interview, and observation. \nData collected from 98 participants ensured a considerable breadth to the study, while \ninterviews with a number of participants also enabled the collection of in-depth data. \nAnalysis and triangulation of the data from the various sources allowed discernment of \nthe research findings. \nA comprehensive and detailed picture of how course outcomes are achieved \nemerged from the findings. Twenty-nine course components were found to influence course outcomes, including various aspects of course activities, the physical \nenvironment, instructors, and the group. The findings indicated that certain course \ncomponents were most influential in determining increases to students' self-awareness, \nself-confidence, self-reliance, self-esteem, self-concept, motivation, self-responsibility, \ninterpersonal skills, concern for others, and concern for the environment. A number of \ncourse components were found to indirectly contribute to positive course outcomes by \nhelping maximize the effectiveness of other components, by increasing students' \nmotivation while on course, or by facilitating the processing and transference of new \ninformation. The findings also suggested that several course components either \ndirectly or indirectly affected course outcomes in negative ways. In addition, the \ngender, age, population, and expectations of students were found to play a role in \ndetermining the course outcomes they experienced and in determining which course \ncomponents caused those outcomes. \nInterpretation of the findings resulted in the generation of research-based \ntheory. The main theoretical argument derived from the results of the study was that \ncourse outcomes are influenced by a combination of course components and \ncharacteristics of students. More specifically, the theory generated by the study \nindicated that five groupings of factors contribute to course outcomes, including \ncourse activities, the physical environment, instructors, the group, and students' \ncharacteristics. The study was considered in relation to existing adventure education \nliterature and larger theoretical issues. The generated theory and research findings \nwere then used to develop suggestions for improving practice at OBWC and other \nadventure education organizations, as well as for enhancing future research studies.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,002 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle