The perception of space between body and form : a school for photography in downtown Vancouver
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
This thesis addresses issues of perception between body and form and questions how architecture as built form conveys meaning through the phenomena of perception. Particularity looking at how architecture as built form affects one's perception of being in space and time through one's experience of being both within a building, and within the city on a larger scale. Through the phenomena of perception one is able to realize the intentions which built form conveys as part of an experiential realm which exists between body and form. Such a discussion involves one's ability to merge one's inner perceptions with a reading of the role or purpose an object facilitates through it's presence and it's occupation of space. Built form conveys meaning through the use of architectural elements to define spatial relationships which act as a framework for one's being in time. Architectural elements such as the ground plane, walls, floor slabs, roof, and structural systems occupy space in a manner that conveys intentions and defines spatial relationships between the body and the design project in it's entirety. Such intentions have meaning to one's existence of being in space through the perceived value of the object, it's 'reason for being' in relation to one's own existence of being in space and time. Through the use of architectural elements one perceives the body's position in space in relation to distances, scale, and the marking of site which defines spatial relationships between the body and the building within it's given context. The design project, a school for photography located in downtown Vancouver, explores how one's perception of being in space and time is paralleled by a means of construction, both physical and mental constructions of space, which frame one's experiences of being within a building, and one's experience of being within the city. The project constructs space through the use of built form and it's occupation of site to convey meaning through one's ability to perceive the school as a place within the city for viewing, and for drawing attention to photography as a medium through which representations of space are produced within the public eye.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».