MétaCan
Menu
← Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2287997755

Barriers to Learning: The Case for Integrated Mental Health Services in Schools

2016· article· en· W2287997755 sur OpenAlexaffvenue
Marcella Ogenchuk

Notice bibliographique

RevueCanadian Journal of Education / Revue canadienne de l éducation · 2016
Typearticle
Langueen
DomainePsychology
ThématiqueChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
Établissements canadiensUniversity of Saskatchewan
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésMental healthReading (process)Public relationsPsychologySociologyPedagogyPolitical sciencePsychiatryLaw
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

D. S. Lean & V. A. Colucci (2010). Barriers to learning: The case for integrated mental health services in schools. Plymouth, UK: Rowman & Littlefield Education. 120 pp., ISBN 978-1-60709-638-2 (paperback) Barriers to Learning: The Case for Integrated Mental Health Services in Schools, which brings timely attention to the issue of increasing pediatric mental health problems, presents a need for integrated mental health resources in the school setting. The title of this book accurately summarizes the focus of the work: the issues that impede student learning and the solutions necessary to improve student achievement. Although Michael Fullan, in his preface, suggests that this book is a must read for education reformers, I would encourage a read by individuals interested in pediatric health and education. As the authors point out, silos exist in the present education system and creating understanding of the barriers among concerned stakeholders and their agencies can be achieved by reading this book. The book, well organized into seven chapters, begins with a prologue where the authors capture the attention of the readers by presenting a vivid and realistic depiction of a typical school day in a non-integrated school system. The detailed account of each character, their behaviors and the particular barriers they faced, immediately drew my interest into the book. In the first chapter, the authors outline the increase in mental health issues and distinguish the two classifications of support services presently available: school-based and school-linked. Further, they define barriers to learning as a temporary or permanent factor, condition, or situation that obstructs or impedes academic progress, resulting in mild to severe effects. A detailed conceptualization depicts two types of barriers to learning, biological-psychological and environmental-circumstantial, as well as two types of outcomes, negative and positive. This conceptualization (represented diagrammatically) depicts how a reduction and prevention of barriers can ameliorate student symptoms and increase student achievement. Additionally, these authors argue that a broad base of professionals, situated uniquely in a school, is necessary to make accurate diagnoses and to recommend appropriate early interventions. The authors also recommend a universal preventative approach to target interventions, based on locally predetermined student needs. In the second and third chapters, the authors identify biological-psychological and environmental-circumstantial barriers to learning. The authors interestingly present the disorders and their descriptions in the order in which they are most likely to be referred, rather than by prevalence. They suggest that biological-psychological barriers to learning, which are the most common, are often the only barriers considered when students have difficulties because school systems are structured to primarily deal with these particular barriers. The author presents useful examples of environmental-circumstantial and biological-psychological symptoms, making the argument that more attention needs to be given to the former symptoms to protect against misdiagnosis and ineffective treatment. Along with describing inadequate interventions, the fourth chapter lists examples of negative outcomes (bullying, school refusal, addictions, early school leaving, suicide, and youth violence) that occur when students receive inadequate interventions to address barriers to learning. In addition to these outcomes, the authors propose that students who are not facing barriers to learning may experience a negative multi-ripple process whereby their academic progress is also compromised because of inadequately addressing other students' barriers. The fifth chapter of the book includes a brief literature review of present and proposed reforms in the education system, which more recently are driven by student achievement (through school leadership and pedagogy) and the mental health system. …

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,013
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,016
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,030
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,134

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0130,016
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,001
Bibliométrie0,0020,002
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0180,047
Communication savante0,0210,020
Science ouverte0,0050,022
Intégrité de la recherche0,0150,021
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0050,001

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,026
Tête enseignante GPT0,302
Écart entre enseignants0,276 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2016
Routes d'admission2
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueCanadian Journal of Education / Revue canadienne de l éducation→Même sujetChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development→Travaux en français237 207→