MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2288260413

Model Development and Validation of Samaria Doped Ceria (SDC) Based Solid Oxide Fuel Cell Operating with Practical Fuels

2013· dissertation· en· W2288260413 sur OpenAlexfundno aff
M. I. Ismail

Notice bibliographique

RevueUWSpace (University of Waterloo) · 2013
Typedissertation
Langueen
DomaineMaterials Science
ThématiqueAdvancements in Solid Oxide Fuel Cells
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesUniversity of WaterlooMinistry of Higher Education, Malaysia
Mots-clésOverpotentialSyngasSolid oxide fuel cellOperating temperatureMaterials scienceAnodeChemical engineeringElectrolyteProcess engineeringElectrochemistryHydrogenChemistryElectrodeElectrical engineeringEngineering
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Solid Oxide Fuel Cell (SOFC) is a promising technology for producing electricity cleanly and efficiently. This type of fuel cell is a high temperature fuel cell operating around 1000C for state-of-the-art SOFC. An advantage of the high temperature is the possibility of combined heat and power generation which would even further increase the efficiency of this technology. However, due to high operating temperatures, there are problems associated with the development and commercialization of SOFC, such as requirement of high temperature gas seals, and relatively poor long-term stability. The current trend in SOFC development is therefore to reduce the operating temperature of the cell to the range 600-800°C. However, this requires developing new cell designs and materials since decreasing the operating temperature increases the ohmic overpotential due to higher ionic diffusion resistance in the electrolyte, thereby reducing electrochemical performance. For intermediate temperature SOFC, SDC is a promising electrolyte material to reduce the ohmic overpotential.
\nThe present research focused on developing a 1D model of SDC based SOFC validated for a number of feed gas compositions, from humidified H2, mixture of CO and CO2, to several syngas compositions (typical of diesel syngas, biomass syngas and pre-reformed natural gas). The model was developed for an anode supported cell. Few parameters were used as free fit parameters: essentially structural parameters, such as porosity and tortuosity, as well as kinetic parameters for H2 and CO electrochemical reactions. In most cases, the simulated results (polarization curve) fitted well the experimental data. It was seen that the performance of CO/CO2 system is considerably lower than the H2/H2O system. The model results also allowed to access variables’ profiles that would not be accessible experimentally, such species composition profile and local current density along the anode. In particular, it was observed that most the electrochemical reaction occurred within 10 m away from the anode/electrolyte interface.
\nIn the literature, the water-gas shift (WGS) reaction is considered to occur only over Ni, but the present work demonstrated that SDC is active toward the WGS reaction. Therefore, a kinetic study was carried out to determine a rate expression for the WGS reaction. This rate expression was then incorporated into the SOFC model. The results indicated that inclusion of the WGS reaction on SDC has minor or negligible effect in most situations, except in the case of CO mole fraction for the diesel syngas feed at higher cell voltage. The reason was that the composition of diesel syngas was such that there was a higher driving force for the WGS reaction to proceed in the reverse WGS direction. When the water content is high enough, as in the case of higher current densities, the form of the derived rate expression for the WGS on SDC makes the value of this rate very small. The rate expression was derived using relatively small amounts of water because of experimental limitation and therefore, the form of this rate needs to be revisited by considering higher amount of water.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesMéta-épidémiologie (sens strict)
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Expérimental (laboratoire) · Signal consensuel: Expérimental (laboratoire)
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,450
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,001
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,020
Tête enseignante GPT0,244
Écart entre enseignants0,224 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Devis d'étudeExpérimental (laboratoire)
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations2
Publié2013
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueUWSpace (University of Waterloo)Même sujetAdvancements in Solid Oxide Fuel CellsTravaux en français237 207