Notice bibliographique
Résumé
The University of British Columbia (UBC) has been monitoring transportation to and from their Vancouver Point Grey campus since 1997. The data collected has been used to inform planning decisions such as land use and transportation planning decisions. 1 In October 2014, UBC Campus and Community Planning published a new Transportation Plan for their Vancouver Campus to consolidate and update existing plans such as the 2005 Strategic Transportation Plan. The 2014 Transportation Plan identifies the need for, and commits to developing, a “comprehensive” on-campus transportation monitoring system. Until now, Campus and Community Planning has been reliant on surveys of the campus population to approximate on-campus mobility patterns. Under the guidance of Campus and Community Planning, through the Social Environmental Economic Development Studies Program, and with funding from the Alma Mater Society’s Sustainability Projects Fund, I conducted a pilot study using Global Positioning System (GPS) data loggers to monitor on-campus transportation patterns. By completing this pilot study, I am able to make recommendations to UBC Campus and Community Planning on the feasibility of using GPS technology for on-campus transportation monitoring. The week-long pilot study, consisting of 10 participants, has collected sufficient data to show the positive and negative aspects of the technology. While I have not conducted the pilot study in a statistically representative manner, some abstractions can still be made from the data that I have collected. This report concludes with a recommendation that GPS technology does indeed have a place in a comprehensive on-campus transportation monitoring system at UBC’s Vancouver campus. I make several cautions as to the fine scale accuracy of the technology and the ease of working with the data, but show that the end product still has the level of detail necessary to inform planning decisions. Finally, I note that the implementation of an exciting new technology such as GPS catches people’s attention, which in turn could lead to increased public engagement in sustainability and transportation planning, if the message is well presented. Disclaimer: “UBC SEEDS provides students with the opportunity to share the findings of their studies, as well as their opinions, conclusions and recommendations with the UBC community. The reader should bear in mind that this is a student project/report and is not an official document of UBC. Furthermore readers should bear in mind that these reports may not reflect the current status of activities at UBC. We urge you to contact the research persons mentioned in a report or the SEEDS Coordinator about the current status of the subject matter of a project/report.”
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».