African Canadians in Union Blue: Volunteering for the Cause in the Civil War by Richard M. Reid
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Reviewed by: African Canadians in Union Blue: Volunteering for the Cause in the Civil War by Richard M. Reid Ikuko Asaka African Canadians in Union Blue: Volunteering for the Cause in the Civil War. By Richard M. Reid. American Abolitionism and Antislavery. (Kent, Ohio: Kent State University Press, 2015. Pp. [xvi], 292. Paper, $28.95, ISBN 978-1-60635-255-7.) Through the examination of African Canadians’ participation in the U.S. Civil War, Richard M. Reid engages a much larger question: the complexity of black mobility and community formation across the Canada-U.S. border. The author’s primary concern is the scope and context of African Canadians’ volunteering for the Union cause, which he reconstructs by inventively harnessing the few primary sources available: U.S. and Canadian censuses, military records, and pension applications, as well as newspapers and personal documents. This substantive account of black volunteers from British North America (first published in hardcover in 2014 by University of British Columbia Press) is divided into seven chapters. Together, they cover topics such as the volunteers’ divergent backgrounds, their numbers, their motivations, their recruitment and wartime experiences in the navy and army, their postbellum lives, and black medical doctors from Canada West who offered their services to the Union army. In addition to the commendable work of tallying the number of navy and army recruits born in British North America—almost 1,200—Reid’s contributions include his illustration of the bilateral flows of African Americans and African Canadians before the Civil War. Such recognition complicates the standard narrative that only acknowledges black migration from the United States to Canada. According to Reid, during the 1850s hundreds of black British Americans proceeded to northern states, especially the region’s urban areas. Boston was one of those cities that drew African Canadians, with a large segment of its foreign-born black residents coming from the British provinces. This finding leads to another important revision—that some black recruits had already lived in the United States when they volunteered—a revelation that debunks the widely held view that black recruits came rushing from Canada only after the Civil War began. The author’s attention to black Canadians’ prewar movements into the United States can also be seen in his discussion of black navy volunteers. By 1861 it had become commonplace for black sailors from British North America to serve in the U.S. Navy. This practice points to a long-standing transnational context that set the stage for wartime black enlistment. Furthermore, this story should especially intrigue those interested in Canada’s place in the intricacies of the African diaspora, for it suggests black Canadians’ incorporation into the cosmopolitan world of black seafaring, as detailed by W. Jeffrey Bolster in Black Jacks: African American Seamen in the Age of Sail (Cambridge, Mass., 1997). While these contributions are all compelling, the book fails to adequately address the question of identity. Reid does not discuss the category of the historical subject he creates here—African Canadians—in relation to the protean understandings of self as glimpsed in his telling of their mobile existence. Examination of the malleable politics of African Canadians indeed requires a unique paradigm of subjective formation that accounts for their versatile way of being. In that sense, the book would have benefited from existing work on the plasticity of self among black residents in Canada, such [End Page 173] as Afua Cooper’s “The Fluid Frontier: Blacks and the Detroit River Region, Focus on Henry Bibb” (Canadian Review of American Studies, 30, no. 2 [2000], pp. 127–48). Still, African Canadians in Union Blue: Volunteering for the Cause in the Civil War is a welcome addition to the growing literature on the complex lives of people of African descent in British North America. Ikuko Asaka University of Illinois Copyright © 2016 The Southern Historical Association
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,004 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».