Implementing visions for sustainable development in regional land use planning
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Large scale natural resource policies, which focus on environmental objectives from a global perspective and cut across sectors and disciplines, are often motivated by a desire to find general models for resource use. These large scale policies, in this thesis refered to as Grand Visions, focus on sustainable development which is now a priority issue of governments. However, visionary policies often fall short of providing workable "how-to" solutions for practitioners. This interdisciplinary thesis bridges the gap between visionary policies and regional planning by developing a "road map" for practitioners which addresses the priorities of global concerns while maintaining practicality. Planned management of land resources is an essential part of implementing sustainable development concepts. The challenge was to find a means of implementing sustainable development in a regional land use planning context. The link between large scale policy and regional implementation was forged through translating broad qualitative guidelines into actions for regional and local planning. The schema was developed through literature, interviews, and case study analyses, and was tested through application in regional jurisdictions. An evaluation framework to compare the case studies was developed from the literature. It consists of twenty parallel principles: ten for Grand Visions and ten for regional planning. The research was focused on natural resource policy and planning in Sweden and Canada. Regional planning examples from Anuner An and Kluane were analysed. Analysis revealed overlaps and inconsistencies between Grand Vision and planning principles. Despite the gaps, bridging was found to be possible. To counteract the inherent imbalance between visionary policies and practical planning approaches, a reversed emphasis is proposed. Resource policy objectives, structures and implementation processes need go beyond reflecting Grand Vision principles by emphasizing planning objectives more explicitly as well as institutional and process factors. On the other hand, planning approaches need to reflect Grand Vision principles, emphasizing substantive objectives. In summary, this thesis addresses the problem of implementing large scale visionary resource policies through developing and utilizing analytical frameworks from both theory and field situations in two countries. Its major contribution is the identification of gaps between visionary policies and planning and specification of means of bridging these gaps.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,003 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».