Reflection on Higher Education in the Arts in Mainland China: An Opportunity to Promote Artists Personal Development?
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
1. BackgroundChinese culture has a long history, heavily influenced by a Confucian outlook on politics and education. Confucianism promotes social liquidity and equity, by advocating the belief that if a good scholar is encouraged through education, ordinary people will be motivated to pursue official careers through learning. A hundred years ago China adopted modern educational practices from the West. Firstly, it drew on the experiences of Japan, and then began to imitate the German education system. Thus, China's modern education has followed a traditional approach (Guan, 2013). China went on to apply features of the American education system in 1922, and Dewey lectured in China between 1919 and 1921. However, China's education system remained traditionalist. The Soviet Union had the greatest impact on Chinese education prior to the foundation of new China in 1949 (Guo, 2004). The Soviet education system was discipline-oriented, and it retains a significant influence on Chinese education to date. Objectively speaking, this system sought to analyze educational phenomena by applying the tenets of Marxism. These mirrored many of the collectivist values and characteristics of the Confucian approach to education. However, in contrast, artistic achievements evoke a cultural tradition that privileges education for self-improvement and family honor. This is important as Chinese parents set higher educational goals and standards for their children than Western parents do (Brand, 2002). Indeed, family orientation, cultural values, and other societal pressures account for many of the differences between Chinese and Western cultures.It is widely accepted that emphasis on education and knowledge accelerates social cultural development (Wang, 1995). Development advances by attainment of both systematic scientific and cultural knowledge and rudimentary knowledge and skills. However, ignorance of students' subjectivity and development, and the absence of a model to cultivate talent and innovation, characterize Chinese higher education practices. Chinese education policy, in line with politics, is based on uniform plans. Evaluative examinations also remain unchanged, although new curriculum reform is introducing some flexibility, providing space for the development of local curricular and school-based curricular, while maintaining uniformity. As Chinese traditional education practice tends to place students in a passive position, students commonly lack enthusiasm to learn and feel powerless in their choice of study (Guan, 2013). Such an underpowered student body is detrimental to talent cultivation.Since it pursued a policy of opening up and implementing free market reforms in 1979, China's education system has become highly specialized, with many universities expanding, or merging with others, to provide a more comprehensive education in parallel with specialized technical training. However, the entire social environment is characterized by a utilitarianism, which upholds the idea that learning is superior to anything else. Alongside utilitarianism, credentialism has the largest influence on imperial examination systems in Chinese society. In the cultural context of China, utilitarianism places self-interest above other human beings. This outlook not only hides a slew of talents within the student body by imposing superior judgments and quashing creative spirit, but it also fosters an educational practice that results in a strong desire for excellence and poor reaction to failure.The Chinese government is in the process of adapting to the trends of educational universalization, as evidenced in its newly advocated arts policy (Guo, 2012). Henceforth, arts instructors and educators are to be encouraged not only to recognize and value talent, but also to develop students' artisanship, and promote adaptability in their career development (MOE, 2008). As indicated in the introductory section, the concept of professional training is one of the most serious concerns of twenty-first century education systems, which seek to shape the personal qualities required to thrive in a new age. …
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,003 | 0,002 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,013 | 0,010 |
| Communication savante | 0,006 | 0,003 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,006 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,002 | 0,006 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,011 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».