MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2292412738 · doi:10.1353/dqt.2015.0035

The Subterranean Topography of Oliver Twist

2015· article· en· W2292412738 sur OpenAlex

Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base

Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.

aboutLe titre ou le résumé porte un signal canadien du lexique géographique.
no affAucune affiliation canadienne : ce travail est invisible pour une base fondée sur la seule affiliation.
Aucune affiliation canadienne. Une base fondée sur la seule affiliation (le devis habituel) n'aurait jamais vu ce travail. C'est l'un des travaux qui justifient l'inversion de la base.

Notice bibliographique

RevueDickens quarterly · 2015
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueMigration, Policy, and Dickens Studies
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésArt historyPaintingPortraitArtGeorge (robot)

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

The Subterranean Topography of Oliver Twist Ruth Richardson (bio) Introduction Oliver Twist was poised for publication in its first triple-decker book edition in November 1838, when John Forster wrote urgently to Dickens’s publisher Richard Bentley to get two of George Cruikshank’s illustrations pulled from the book’s final volume. The first was the image of Sikes attempting to destroy his dog. The animal, Forster said, looked like a “tail-less baboon” (Letters 1: 450–1). It still does – it was finally left in. But the second image (see Fig. 1) was captioned “Rose Maylie and Oliver.” In it, we look towards a marble Victorian mantelpiece with all its domestic knick-knacks and a roaring fire, a religious painting reflected in the tall pier-glass, and the portrait of Oliver’s mother in an alcove to one side. The mantel-clock is protected under a glass dome, flanked by two hyacinths cupped securely in their glasses, growing straight between supportive guide-sticks, an obvious visual metaphor for child-rearing. Young Oliver is portrayed at the heart of the Maylie family: between old Mrs. Maylie, her newly-wedded son and the fragrant Rose, all comfortably grouped round their happy hearth. The image has since become known as the “Fireside” plate. Forster strongly objected to it. He described it as “a Rowland Macasser frontispiece to a sixpenny book of forfeits” (Letters 1: 450–1). Rowland’s Macassar was an oily hair cream for men, advertised everywhere, including on the advertising pages of the inner cover of Bentley’s Miscellany, in which the monthly parts of Oliver Twist first appeared. Macassar was so ubiquitous that those ornamental cloths which get attached to train seat head-rests and to the backs of upholstered chairs are still known as “antimacassars.” Dickens had associated macassar and gushing sentimentality in his sketch on Watkins Tottle, and with aspirational fraud in “The Tuggses at Ramsgate.” I take Forster to mean that he thought the Fireside plate both hackneyed and suspect: oozing oil and false sentiment, and unworthy of Dickens’s book. The crisis over these illustrations brought Dickens home post-haste to [End Page 293] Click for larger view View full resolution Figure 1. “Rose Maylie and Oliver” or the “Fireside” Plate. Courtesy Dan Calinescu, Boz & Friends Rare Books, Toronto. [End Page 294] Click for larger view View full resolution Figure 2. “Rose Maylie and Oliver” or the “Church” Plate. Courtesy Dan Calinescu, Boz & Friends Rare Books, Toronto. [End Page 295] London from Liverpool. He wrote directly to George Cruikshank: “My dear Cruikshank, I returned suddenly to town yesterday afternoon to look at the latter pages of Oliver Twist before it was delivered to the booksellers, when I saw the majority of the plates in the last volume for the first time. With reference to the last one – Rose Maylie and Oliver. Without entering into the question of great haste or any other cause which may have led to its being what it is – I am quite sure there can be little difference of opinion between us with respect to the result – May I ask you whether you will object to designing this plate afresh and doing so at once in order that as few impressions as possible of the present one may go forth? I feel confident you know me too well to feel hurt by this enquiry, and with equal confidence in you I have lost no time in preferring it.” (Letters 1: 450–1) A strip torn from the bottom edge of Dickens’s copy of the letter may have recorded his suggestion for the new subject with which Cruikshank eventually responded. Cruikshank was not at all pleased to be asked to create a fresh illustration. He disagreed with Dickens’s estimate of his first effort, and dragged his heels in the production of the new image. The result has become known as the “Church” plate (Fig. 2). Cruikshank later described the subject as “without any interest”: “[…] there was not anything in the latter part of the manuscript that would suggest an illustration […] but to oblige Mr. Dickens I did my best to produce another etching, working hard day and night […] but when...

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Qualitatif · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,539
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,996

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,001
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,047
Tête enseignante GPT0,321
Écart entre enseignants0,274 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle