MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2292952889 · doi:10.14288/1.0054744

Graduate dental education in Canada

2010· article· en· W2292952889 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Marcia A. Boyd

Notice bibliographique

RevuecIRcle (University of British Columbia) · 2010
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineHealth Professions
ThématiqueDental Education, Practice, Research
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésPolitical scienceMedical educationMedicine

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Until the mid 1960's British Columbia was dependent upon outside sources for its dental manpower. With a significant increase in population and a similar increase in demand for dental care it became apparent that British Columbia could no longer rely on the goodwill of other universities for the training of the province's dentists. As a result of two detailed studies authored by Dr. John B. Macdonald, a Faculty of Dentistry was established at the University of British Columbia in 1962 and the first undergraduate class admitted in September 1964. After ten years in operation it seemed appropriate to examine the question as to whether or not the implementation of a graduate studies program in the Faculty of Dentistry was justified. In order to provide an in-depth perspective as to the present status of graduate dental education programs a survey questionnaire was sent to all ten dental schools in Canada. The questionnaire dealt with three separate aspects of graduate dental education, namely: 1. the preparation for practice of a clinical dental specialty; 2. the preparation for a teaching and/or research career; and 3. the continued improvement of the existing professional dentist through continuing dental education. Undergraduate dental programs supply manpower to provide for the public's need for regular and routine dental care, while graduate dental education can provide qualified personnel for research, teachers for dental education, as well as dental specialists requiring the advanced skills to meet the public's need for special dental services. Consequently, the aim of both the undergraduate and graduate dental education programs is to provide the knowledge, skill and manpower to meet the dental health care demands of the community. With the advent of prepaid dental care plans, coupled with the public's growing awareness that it is their right to enjoy good dental health, it is clear that the increasing demand for service cannot be met by the undergraduate dental programs alone. Graduate dental education is the beginning of a partial solution to the problem. An analysis of the collected data, taking into consideration the dental care delivery system as it now exists in Canada, has shown that: 1. If undergraduate enrollment in dentistry is to be increased, not only in British Columbia but also in Canada as a whole, it is essential to provide the advanced training needed for personnel to staff the dental schools; 2. more research workers are needed if the answers to the major problems in the field of dentistry are to be found; 3. more clinical specialists are required if the public is to be afforded the treatment necessary in specialty areas; 4. many Canadian dentists pursue their graduate training at American institutions even though there are Canadian programs and positions available within these programs; 5. over the past five years dentists in Canada have demonstrated an increasing interest in continuing dental education programs. If the profession of dentistry is to achieve its ultimate goal of effective and economic treatment of dental disease, then it is of paramount importance for both undergraduate and graduate dental education programs to begin to deliver the professionally equipped personnel needed in Canada.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesCharge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: Observationnel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,257
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0010,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,026
Tête enseignante GPT0,323
Écart entre enseignants0,296 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations1
Publié2010
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revuecIRcle (University of British Columbia)Même sujetDental Education, Practice, ResearchTravaux en français237 207