MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2293525928

The Missing Kidney

2016· article· en· W2293525928 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Maxine Rosaler

Notice bibliographique

RevueSouthern review/˜The œSouthern review · 2016
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueOrgan Donation and Transplantation
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésHarmDreamDirtArtArt historyMedicineHistoryPsychoanalysisPsychologySocial psychology
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

When I was twenty-two years old, I had to leave Montreal, where I was in love with Steven Tomlinson, to go back to New York to have one of my kidneys removed. I had mentioned in course of a routine checkup at McGill University clinic that I peed a lot; doctor tested my urine, one thing led to another, and it was discovered that my right kidney was diseased and shrunken and doing me more harm than good. Steven was my first real boyfriend, first boy I loved and first boy who loved me. Once, he told me with tears in his eyes that he would love me even if I lost an arm; he would love me if I lost a leg; and now he could add a kidney to list of missing body parts whose elimination would in no way alter his love for me. The night before I was to leave for New York, Steven shook me awake at three in morning to tell me that he had had a dream that I wouldn't be coming back to Montreal. He made me swear that I would never leave him. We had vacated apartment we'd been sharing for past six months and were camping out on living room floor of a friend of his, in a sleeping bag that smelled like dirt of creation. I promised that I would come back as soon as I recovered from operation, but I knew I was never coming back; I also knew that I would never find anyone to love me as much as Steven did. My mother referred to Steven as the goy boy, a name she had come up with to belittle him, which was something she had always done, one way or another, with all my boyfriends. I always thought that goy meant Christian, and Steven had been brought up as an atheist, but looking at him through my mother's eyes, there did seem to be something very goyishe about his family--the parents were divorced; father, whom I met one night when I went with Steven to his house for dinner, was an ice-cold professor of experimental psychology; and his third wife, Paula, epitomized a certain kind of Wasp wife. She was a timid, nervous sparrow of a woman, who kept on looking anxiously at her husband, seeking his approval for meal, which must have taken hours to prepare, and which I was incapable of enjoying, my extreme discomfort in presence of Professor Tomlinson having robbed me of all appetite. The one distraction from my own unease that evening was Steven's: his green eyes were clouded over with something I had never seen in them before--a fierce look of self-protectiveness, so different from open and, for me, slightly unsettling look of adoration that I was accustomed to seeing shining in them. The conversation around dinner table consisted of professor asking me questions and me answering them at much greater length than was necessary. When he asked me what my father did for a living, for example, I didn't simply tell him that my father was director of advertising for a small import/export company in Manhattan, I told him that my father hated his job and that he had always wanted to be an English professor but when he was at Columbia University, where his father, a millionaire who was first Jew with a seat on New York Curb Exchange and who had lost all his money in stock market crash of 1929, was on board of directors, dean told my father that Jews couldn't get jobs as professors and so that's why he ended up being in advertising, which was a shame, since he would have been a wonderful English professor; he was a very literary man. Next, Professor Tomlinson asked me how I happened to come to McGill. It was kind of serendipity, I told him, and in one long, run-on sentence I spoke of my nomadic college experience: first, University of Wisconsin, which I hated, except for cold weather (I liked way it would make tiny icicles form in my nose and I liked frozen look of everything); then, my transfer to Harpur College, where in place of goofy-looking Midwesterners, I found neurotic New York Jews; and finally, my decision to transfer to McGill because a girl waiting in line with me at Harpur College cafeteria, where food was inedible except for cinnamon doughnuts, which were fabulous (why had I used that ridiculous word? …

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Étude de cas · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,028
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,095

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,007
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,001
Bibliométrie0,0010,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0030,003
Communication savante0,0030,004
Science ouverte0,0010,002
Intégrité de la recherche0,0030,007
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0280,007

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,020
Tête enseignante GPT0,289
Écart entre enseignants0,269 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeÉtude de cas
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2016
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueSouthern review/˜The œSouthern reviewMême sujetOrgan Donation and TransplantationTravaux en français237 207