MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2293539488 · doi:10.1155/2011/654651

The Need for a Canadian Pain Strategy

2011· article· en· W2293539488 sur OpenAlex

Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base

Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.

affAu moins un auteur déclare une institution canadienne dans l'instantané OpenAlex épinglé.
aboutLe titre ou le résumé porte un signal canadien du lexique géographique.

Notice bibliographique

RevuePain Research and Management · 2011
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiquePain Management and Opioid Use
Établissements canadiensQueen Elizabeth II Health Sciences Centre
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésMEDLINEMedicinePsychologyBiology

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Pain is poorly managed in Canada. This includes acute pain caused by ongoing tissue damage, trauma or surgery, chronic pain and pain related to terminal illness. Reasons for this include under-recognition of the problem, lack of education regarding pain assessment and treatment in graduating health care professionals, and grossly inadequate funding for research regarding pain. Although we have the knowledge and technology, Canadians cannot be sure they will receive adequate or appropriate treatment for pain along the entire continuum of care from community health professionals to specialists in tertiary health care institutions. The magnitude of the problem is increasing. For example, one in five Canadians experiences chronic pain, children are not spared and the prevalence of chronic pain increases with age (1,2). Many people with diseases such as cancer, HIV and cardiovascular disease are now surviving their acute illness with a resultant increase in quantity of life. However, in many cases, they have poor quality of life due to persistent pain caused either by the ongoing illness or nerve damage caused by the disease even after resolution or cure of the disease. In many cases, pain is also caused by disease treatments such as surgery, chemotherapy or radiotherapy (3,4). Chronic pain is associated with the worst quality of life compared with other chronic diseases such as chronic lung or heart disease (2). There is double the risk of suicide in chronic pain patients compared with people without chronic pain (5). Higher pain severity is associated with higher suicide rates (6) and a sense of hopelessness (7), and suicide rates remain higher even when controlling for mental illness (8). A recent review (9) of opioid (narcotic)-related deaths in Ontario, published in the Canadian Medical Association Journal and reported in papers across the country, identified the tragic fact that pain medicationrelated deaths in Ontario are increasing. Even more tragic was the fact that most of the people who died had been seen by a physician within nine to 11 days before death (emergency room visits and office visits) and that the final encounter with the physician involved a mental health or pain-related diagnosis. In almost one-quarter of the cases, the coroner determined that the manner of death was suicide (9). It is tragic that these patients did not get the help that they needed. It is disturbing that in Ontario, the largest province in the country, there is not a single interdisciplinary pain management program that is fully funded by the Ontario Ministry of Health. At present, wait times for care are greater than one year at more than one-third of publicly funded pain clinics in Canada, with vast areas of the country having no access to appropriate care (10). Patients waiting more than six months from the time of referral to assessment experience deterioration in health-related quality of life, increased pain and increasing depression (11). For this reason, the Canadian Pain Society Task Force on Wait Times determined that wait times for chronic pain conditions beyond six months are medically unacceptable and that, in many cases, six months is far too long to wait for care (12). Understanding Pain The International Association for the Study of Pain taxonomy defines pain as “an unpleasant sensory and emotional experience associated with actual or potential tissue damage or described in terms of such damage” (13). Pain is divided into two broad categories – acute pain, which is associated with ongoing tissue damage, and chronic pain, which is generally understood to be pain that has persisted for longer periods of time. acUte or Physiological Pain Sources of acute pain include work, vehicular, domestic and sports injuries; childbirth; surgery; fractures; burns; and medical procedures. Acute pain is caused by tissue damage, with triggering of the inflammatory response and activation of ascending neural systems that convey pain-related information. These systems are complex and involve numerous signalling relays and feedback loops, and multiple chemical neurotransmitters. We are also equipped with a sophisticated descending modulatory system or ‘pain defense network’ that enables the body to fight pain. It is this pain defense system that is activated by drugs (eg, opioids) used to treat pain. Acute pain can be controlled using appropriate physical (eg, ice and splinting), pharmacological (eg, anti-inflammatory drugs and opioids) and psychological (eg, reassurance and anxiety management) treatments. Unfortunately, even in the best hospitals in Canada, patients continue to receive inadequate pain control in emergency rooms and after common surgeries. For example, in a study (14) of postoperative pain control after coronary artery bypass grafting, a common procedure to treat or prevent myocardial infarction, less than 30% of the ordered dose of pain medication was given, with approximately 50% of patients continuing to report moderate to severe pain one to five days after surgery. One-quarter of patients rated the pain as ‘extremely unpleasant’, with significant interference in their ability to function even up to the day before discharge. This included interference with breathing and coughing (critical to prevent postoperative lung infection), general activity and walking. Patients continued to deal with these problems at home 12 weeks later. In another study (15) of patients undergoing ambulatory, ‘same-day’ shoulder surgery, patients continued to experience severe levels of pain and poor sleep for at least seven days after surgery. At the end of the seven-day study, pain levels still had not decreased, with implications for healing and function. Given that same-day surgery is an increasing phenomenon, it is

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,012
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Autre · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,866
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,995

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0120,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,124
Tête enseignante GPT0,350
Écart entre enseignants0,225 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle