Landscape aesthetics and surface mine reclamation : establishing the efficacy of linking ethics, aesthetic preference, ecological health and the concept of sustainable development within the context of a reclamation of an open pit mine
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
The field of mine reclamation has traditionally been dominated by engineers and biologists. With a few notable exceptions, landscape architects in North America have not shown a willingness to participate in reclamation activities. This unwillingness was primarily the result of the perception that the contribution of landscape architects as place-makers was irrelevant due to the often remote location of these mine sites. With advances in transportation, communications, and a rapidly expanding human population, areas that were once considered remote are now accessible. With the rise in social activism resulting from the public's desire for more sustainable forms of economic development, the government has responded by placing ever-increasing restrictions on where mines can be developed in the province of British Columbia. In response to these actions, mine operators have begun to realize that past mine management practices must now give way to new approaches if the industry is to prosper in Canada. This change has lead to a reappraisal of the role landscape architects can play in mine reclamation. For reasons based on their understanding of ethics, aesthetics, and issues of ecology, the profession appears capable of making important contributions to how mine reclamation should be practiced. Having the ability to effectively link all three themes into a coherent whole, landscape architects can move the direction of mine reclamation toward a set of goals that effectively addresses both human and ecologically-based objectives. As an important first step in this process, mine owners must be willing to accept the consequences of ever increasing public participation in all phases of mine development. Building upon the existing concept of design for closure, this participation would require that members of the affected community be involved in the planning and implementation of the mine closure plan. As a consequence of this long-term involvement, it is envisioned that the mining company and local community will develop a foundation of trust that will form the basis of a more sustainable mining industry. With their commitment to the value of public process, landscape architects can be important facilitators in bringing about this change. Key Works: Aesthetic Preference, Acid Rock Drainage, Biodiversity, Environmental Ethics, Ecological Health, Landscape Architecture, Mine Reclamation, Restoration, Sustainable Development, Sustainable Mining, Telkwa Coal Mine.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,002 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,002 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».