Journey to the Sea of Glass: Engaging stakeholders, scientists and decision-makers to protect BC's glass sponge reefs
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Thought to have been extinct for 40 million years, living glass sponge reefs were first discovered in Hecate Strait on the north coast of British Columbia in 1987 and then in 2001 in the Salish Sea. Glass sponge reefs have only been found in Pacific Northwest, making them globally significant as well as ecologically important. The reefs are also extremely fragile, studies have shown that approximately half of B.C.’s reefs have been already been damaged by bottom trawling. The Canadian Parks and Wilderness Society (CPAWS) has been working to protect B.C.’s glass sponge reefs since 2002 by increasing engagement at all levels, from decision-makers and scientists, to the general public. To bridge the gaps between science, conservation, and policy, we have built strong working relationships with decision makers at all levels of government and with leading international scientists, including Dr. Manfred Krautter (University of Stuttgart) and Dr. Sally Leys (University of Alberta). Working closely with scientists ensures that our messaging is current and supports the development and achievement of science-based, solution-oriented campaign objectives. In 2008, we co-hosted a Glass Sponge Reef Symposium with Natural Resources Canada (NRCAN) to facilitate collaborative research between scientists. We also performed a tour of coastal communities with Dr. Krautter and our glass sponge mascot “Mr. Stinky” to engage the public with both the issues and the ongoing research. We work closely with community groups to strengthen our reach throughout the region. In May 2013 we hosted a Glass Sponge Reef Conservation Workshop for conservation groups, scientists, and resource managers to share information, identify knowledge gaps, and discuss protection measures in the Salish Sea. In October 2013, in partnership with Nuytco Research Ltd, we hosted al two-day submarine expedition to one of the Salish Sea reefs with a public competition to win a seat. The primary aim was to raise awareness of the reefs and engage a wider audience. The event was extremely successful, achieving local, national and international media coverage including National Geographic, Global BC TV, and CBC. We also created a series of social media-friendly short films around the event to benefit ongoing engagement efforts. By engaging stakeholders at all levels our campaign has been instrumental in raising public awareness of the reefs, the development of Canada’s Pacific Region Cold-Water Coral and Sponge Conservation Strategy 2010-2015, and establishment of the Hecate Strait glass sponge reef Marine Protected Area. We are currently campaigning for fishing closures for the Salish Sea reefs, which should be established in early 2014 and will be an important step in the development of a marine protected area.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,008 | 0,011 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,035 | 0,008 |
| Communication savante | 0,010 | 0,004 |
| Science ouverte | 0,002 | 0,015 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,004 | 0,009 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,011 | 0,002 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».