MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2298422064 · doi:10.1353/acs.2015.0070

Agnes Repplier: The Secular Writer as Saint

2015· article· en· W2298422064 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Thom Nickels

Notice bibliographique

RevueAmerican Catholic Studies · 2015
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueAmerican Constitutional Law and Politics
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésSAINTInscribed figureSurpriseObituaryLegendHistoryArt historySociologyClassicsLawArchaeology

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Agnes Repplier:The Secular Writer as Saint Thom Nickels (bio) In the heart of Center City Philadelphia there is a small graveyard alongside the church of Saint John the Evangelist. A careful reading of the headstones will reveal the tomb of the Repplier family. How many Repplier family members are buried in this vault is a mystery because on the stone there are no inscribed names. Even peering through the graveyard’s wrought iron fence for a closer look will not reveal the name, Agnes Repplier. In many ways, this graveyard ‘invisibility’ symbolizes what the famous writer’s life was like when she was known as “the quiet lady writer who lives west of the Schuylkill.” While people the world over may have loved her books, the appreciation she received for her work, at least in Philadelphia, was at best lukewarm. Well into her writing career, Repplier’s Philadelphia roots took some in the literary world by surprise. After one Boston lecture before an assembly of High Tea types, it was declared unanimously that the speaker couldn’t possibly be from Philadelphia, unless she was “a Bryn Mawr woman.”1 Repplier took such reactions in stride, and always wanted to be known as a Philadelphian. Her 1950 Philadelphia Inquirer obituary even states that, “While Miss Repplier was widely known throughout the English speaking world for her essays on literature, social problems and the fads and foibles of people, and while she had traveled extensively in this country and had studied in Europe, she remained primarily throughout her life a Philadelphian.” [End Page 109] Her life and career spanned many important periods in the nation’s history: the presidency of Abraham Lincoln, the closing of the Victorian Age, her meetings with Walt Whitman, Edith Wharton and Henry James, as well as living through two World Wars, the Korean War and witnessing the rise of the Soviet Union. Whatever the epochal event or calamity, the “Dean of American essayists” was there to write about it and her changing country. She also managed to do so by balancing a worldly intellectual life while remaining a devout Catholic, a feat which must have been a spiritual tightrope at times given the strict ‘disposition’ of pre-Vatican II Catholicism. If Repplier’s religion caused her to experience any stress within literary circles, she kept it hidden. Throughout her life, the essayist whom The New York Times would call “The Jane Austen of the essay,” not only kept the faith but managed to win the praise of an acerbic wit like Dorothy Parker. By contrast, it would be difficult to imagine a devout Catholic writer doing a similar thing today, given the polarizing effect that social issues have on what it means to be devout. In her essays on life, literature, and American politics, Repplier never betrays her cosmopolitan tastes and learning. Even when discussing ‘Catholic issues,’ such as in her essay “Goodness and Gaiety,” she takes swipes at humorless sanctity, especially as it relates Catholic hagiographical tendencies in the lives of the saints. Repplier decried these “embodiments of inaccessible virtues, as remote from us and from our neighbors as if they lived on another planet.” She solidified her view with a reference to Cardinal Newman “who first entered a protest against ‘minced saints,’ [and] against the pious and popular custom of chopping up human records into lessons for the devout.”2 About hagiographers in general, the compulsive heavy smoker who would nevertheless live to be 95 wrote, “In their desire to be edifying, they cease to be convincing.”3 In her book, Mère Marie of the Ursulines, Repplier examines the life of Mère Marie, a widowed woman of thirty who entered the Urusline convent in Tours, France, and who was then recruited to do missionary work in New France, or Quebec, in 1678. “It is inevitable,” Repplier wrote, “that commentators on Mère Marie’s life should compare her to that great mystic and great executrix, Saint Theresa … one of the high lights of hagiography. Her field was wider than Mère Marie’s, her task harder, her mind keener, her personality more magnetic. She has stamped herself upon the history of her...

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,019
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,064

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,003
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0060,002
Communication savante0,0050,002
Science ouverte0,0000,002
Intégrité de la recherche0,0020,005
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0190,014

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,076
Tête enseignante GPT0,398
Écart entre enseignants0,322 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2015
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueAmerican Catholic StudiesMême sujetAmerican Constitutional Law and PoliticsTravaux en français237 207