MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2299263758 · doi:10.26021/6291

Mimicking virus removal and transport in aquifer media using surface-modified silica nanoparticles

2014· article· en· W2299263758 sur OpenAlexfundaboutno aff
Kata Farkas

Notice bibliographique

RevueUniversity of Canterbury Research Repository (University of Canterbury) · 2014
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineEnvironmental Science
ThématiqueBacteriophages and microbial interactions
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesMarsden FundRoyal Society Te ApārangiMcGill University
Mots-clésAquiferNanoparticleEnvironmental scienceChemical engineeringGeologyGroundwaterEngineeringGeotechnical engineering

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Contamination of drinking water sources, such as groundwater, by pathogens (protozoa, bacteria and viruses) is of major concern globally. Due to their small size, mobility and high infectivity, enteric viruses have been a focus of groundwater research. However, the behaviour of enteric viruses in aquifer media is still poorly understood, which is partially attributable to the lack of reliable surrogates for these viruses. In the study reported in this thesis, a new type of surrogate was characterised and validated for its use in studying virus fate and transport in groundwater. The surrogates developed were composed of 70 nm carboxylated silica nanoparticles, labelled with dsDNA tags for sensitive detection, and coated with selected proteins to mimic the physico-chemical characteristics (size, charge, density) of two enteric viruses, human rotavirus and adenovirus, frequently found in faecal-contaminated groundwater. The selected enteric viruses and a commonly used virus surrogate, the MS2 bacteriophage, were purified and characterised in terms of size, surface charge, hydrophobicity and aggregation. For validation, the characteristics, the adsorption, degradation and transport of the surface-modified nanoparticles and the viruses were investigated in laboratory studies and compared. The characterisation of the viruses and particles revealed that the modified silica nanoparticles resemble the size and negative surface charge of the rotavirus and adenovirus. In general, the nanoparticles were found to be less hydrophobic than the enteric viruses, thus presumably less interactive with hydrophobic media. In contrast, the MS2 bacteriophage was smaller in size than the enteric viruses studied and considerably more hydrophobic implying stronger interactions with hydrophobic media. The surface-modified nanoparticles were found to be more stable and remained more monodispersed over time than the purified enteric viruses. In laboratory studies using simulated groundwater, the DNA-labelled nanoparticles were more stable over time than the rotavirus, the adenovirus or a plasmid DNA on its own. Interestingly, the study revealed that rotavirus was more persistent than the adenovirus over time in terms of degradation and aggregation, however, day light considerably enhanced rotavirus degradation. The adsorption studies revealed strong interactions between the enteric viruses and natural aquifer media (gravel and sand), whereas most of the surface-modified nanoparticles adsorbed weakly to these media. Only the casein-coated nanoparticles adsorbed strongly to the sand. The MS2 adsorbed to the gravel strongly, but weakly to the sand implying different interactions. The studies on virus and nanoparticle adsorption to hydrophobic-coated and non-modified Ottawa sand supported the results of characterisation. Column studies investigating the transport of the viruses and the nanoparticles in gravel and sand showed that even though gravel had high adsorption capacity in the adsorption tests, all viruses and nanoparticles travelled though the gravel columns with little retention, probably due to insufficient interaction time. This highlights the vulnerability of gravel aquifers to virus contamination. Experiments using sand columns showed great differences in the transport of the particles. Results suggested that the recovery of the DNA-labelled nanoparticles was similar to the recovery of the adenovirus, however, their transport pattern was different. The glycoprotein-, the protein A- and the AMBP-coated nanoparticles mimicked the transport pattern and low recovery of the rotavirus. In contrast, the streptavidin- and casein-coated nanoparticles were not recovered, emphasising the great importance of surface structure in particle transport. The results of this study demonstrated the usefulness of protein-coated silica nanoparticles as virus surrogates in groundwater studies. Surface-modified nanoparticles are able to mimic the surface characteristics of viruses. The glycoprotein-, protein A- and AMBP-coated particles were found to be suitable surrogates for rotavirus, whereas the DNA-labelled nanoparticles resembled adenovirus behaviour in hydrophilic media. Using particles with different material, size and protein-coating other pathogens can be modelled as well. Furthermore, these particles are expected to besafe to humans and the environment, thus can be used in a great variety of experiments in environmental research.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Expérimental (laboratoire) · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,744
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,957

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,001
Communication savante0,0000,001
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,028
Tête enseignante GPT0,243
Écart entre enseignants0,214 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeExpérimental (laboratoire)
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations2
Publié2014
Routes d'admission2
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueUniversity of Canterbury Research Repository (University of Canterbury)Même sujetBacteriophages and microbial interactionsTravaux en français237 207