High resolution cholangioscopic electrohydraulic lithotripsy for fragmentation and extraction of impacted cystic duct stones
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
A 29-year-old woman presented with right-sided abdominal pain and jaundice. The patient was postpartum but otherwise healthy. Her total bilirubin level was 74 µmol/L. Abdominal ultrasound revealed a 9-mm dilated proximal common bile duct (CBD), a suspected CBD stone and a distended gallbladder with gallstones. The patient underwent endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP); however, no obvious filling defects were seen in the CBD. A convex filling defect was seen protruding from the cystic duct confluence, with proximal dilatation and an absence of gallbladder filling ([ Fig. 1 ]). Sphincterotomy was performed, and but the stones could not be extracted by means of balloon sweeps. A plastic biliary stent was placed and the patient underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Intraoperative choledochoscopy revealed an impacted stone at the cystic duct confluence. Despite attempts to extract the stone with three wire baskets and two Fogarty catheters, the stone could not be removed. Fig. 1 A 29-year-old postpartum woman presented with right-sided abdominal pain and jaundice: fluoroscopic image from initial endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP), showing a filling defect at the level of the cystic duct, representing an impacted cystic duct stone. Repeat ERCP with high resolution single-operator peroral cholangioscopy (SpyGlass DS system; Boston Scientific, Marlborough, Massachusetts, USA) [ 1 ] was performed ([ Video 1 ]). Cholangiography revealed a filling defect at the cystic duct level. A balloon occlusion cholangiogram revealed absence of cystic duct filling ([ Fig. 2 ]). The SpyGlass DS system was then maneuvered into the CBD under fluoroscopy, and high resolution cholangioscopy was performed. An 8-mm stone impacted in the cystic duct was visualized ([ Fig. 3 a ]). An electrohydraulic lithotripsy (EHL) probe was used to fragment the stone ([ Fig. 3 b ]). The SpyGlass system was removed from the CBD, and a balloon was used to successfully extract the fragments from the cystic duct and CBD ([ Fig. 4 ]). Quality: mobile 360 480 720 Download In a 29-year-old postpartum woman, presenting with right-sided abdominal pain and jaundice, high resolution cholangioscopy shows the impacted cystic duct stone and fragmentation of the stone by electrohydraulic lithotripsy probe. An endoscopic view of balloon extraction of the stone fragments is shown. Fig. 2 Fluoroscopic image from repeat ERCP, showing absence of cystic duct filling with balloon occlusion cholangiogram. Fig. 3 High resolution cholangioscopic images acquired using the SpyGlass DS system, showing: a an impacted stone at the cystic duct confluence; b fragmentation of the impacted cystic duct stone by means of an electrohydraulic lithotripsy (EHL) probe. Fig. 4 Endoscopic image showing balloon extraction of the fragments of the previously impacted cystic duct stone from the common bile duct after electrohydraulic lithotripsy. EHL has previously been paired with multioperator and low resolution cholangioscopy for fragmentation of CBD, cystic duct, and gallbladder stones [ 2 ] [ 3 ] [ 4 ] [ 5 ]. Here we present the first report of a safe, single-operator procedure for high resolution identification and fragmentation of cystic duct stones, which can potentially spare patients invasive, technically difficult, and costly re-operations. Endoscopy_UCTN_Code_TTT_1AR_2AH
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».