Notice bibliographique
Résumé
which the present article summarizes, included the suggestion that I should select some topic that I had been interested in for most of my professional life, and follow its development to the present.I chose to talk about ozone because I do have some milestones to chart the progress of my interest, and because, as I shall show you, it is becoming more relevant, rather than less, as time goes on.I shall also provide some notes on the development of interest in the small airways of the lung; the reason for this parallel history will become evident as we come up to date.The story of the 'discovery' of ozone by Schonbein in Basel, Switzerland, in the middle of the 19th century is an interesting one.He had worked in England teaching German at a boarding school, and at that time, he met Michael Faraday.Here he must have learned that an electric spark is often followed by a curious smell; when he got back to Basel he later became a professor of chemistry and was able to show that it was ozone (O 3 ) that was being formed.He did a very thorough job of investigating the properties of this gas, and discovered that it was intensely irritant.Its bactericidal properties became the centre of attention later in the century, and WS Gilbert wrote some doggerel verse calling it "Nature's Great Cleanser".This was unearthed by Bill Linn.I believe it was the German V2 rocket program that led to the recognition of the ozone layer, starting at approximately 30,000 feet (9144 m) and rapidly increasing to a maximum at approximately 50,000 km before waning.I am not sure of the history of this, but I was first shown German data on the ozone layer on a visit to the Royal Aeronautical Establishment at Farnborough.Our research group, led by Ronald Christie at Bart's Hospital (Farnborough, United Kingdom), was one of the few research groups with an interest in the lung, and we exchanged relevant information.It was there that I learned that the foam rubber in the passenger oxygen masks in the de Havilland Comet had deteriorated rapidly, and that the Dunlop company had suggested that it must be ozone that had caused this disintegration.The 'Comet' was the first aircraft to fly routinely above 30,000 feet.We all realized that we knew nothing of the toxicity of ozone if inhaled at sea level; however, this research was made difficult by the lack of any reliable instrument to measure the gas concentration.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,003 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,003 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,003 | 0,002 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,003 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,003 | 0,003 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,040 | 0,015 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».