MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2301832626 · doi:10.14288/1.0055686

Adult educators’ role in the rehabilitation of physically disabled adults

2010· article· en· W2301832626 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Marie-Louise Holden

Notice bibliographique

RevuecIRcle (University of British Columbia) · 2010
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueDisability Education and Employment
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésRehabilitationPsychologyPhysical medicine and rehabilitationMedicineDevelopmental psychologyGerontologyPhysical therapy

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

The purposes of this study were to investigate the psychosocial needs of the chronically disabled and to determine the extent to which the adult educator could further expand the educational opportunities which could partially fulfill these needs. Due to limited research by adult educators in this field, most of the literature investigated and consultations conducted were in other disciplines. In the chronic care field, medical personnel were visited, extended care and rehabilitation centres were inspected, disabled persons were interviewed, and facilities for the disabled at universities in Vancouver, B.C. were studied. Finally, a four-month field study was undertaken at an extended care hospital in Victoria, B.C. The field study followed "A Model for Research and Evaluation on Rehabilitation" proposed by Suchman. The literature revealed that the number of physically disabled has increased in this century with a corresponding rise in their psychosocial needs. In previous centuries the numbers of chronically disabled were few and the medical orientation was towards the physical aspect of disease. This practice has persisted to the present day. Owing to these increases and to the fact that there appears to be insufficient time for the complete care of the patient, both physical and psychosocial, the psychosocial needs cannot be adequately met by physicians and nurses. These needs are now recognized, and they appear to be predominately social. Sociologists and adult educators should participate to prevent these needs from becoming psychological. Three factors that may determine the outcome of rehabilitation are: Motivation, goals and integration and these aspects are illustrated in the case histories studied. The adult educators must recognize the importance of their role in achieving these factors with the disabled. Unlike Sweden, no comprehensive effort has been made in North America to provide education for the disabled. Some universities and adult educational facilities have been modified and services supplied to the disabled but few adult educators offer services to these people outside of institutions and yet the value of education, whether it be for self-enrichment or vocational rehabilitation, cannot be overemphasized. Even in the brief field study at St. Mary's Extended Care Hospital the benefits of adult education in aiding rehabilitation were demonstrated. It is concluded that there might be two main causes for this oversight by adult educators. The first is that there is no inclusive registry of disabled, therefore, the extent of the problem might not be apparent. The second is that there are no courses for adult educators on the medical problems of the disabled and adult educators are thereby ill-prepared to assist in rehabilitation. It is recommended that the Provincial Government register all the disabled; that the Canadian Adult Education Association familiarize its members with this problem; and that it suggest further research and study in this area. Courses should be organized by Continuing Education Departments at Universities, Colleges, Adult Education Centres or by Correspondence. Adult Education Research Centres should further explore the role of adult educators in the field. Adult Education Departments should stress the removal of all physical barriers from educational facilities. Correspondence courses and personal contacts should be initiated and maintained in the home by the adult educator or volunteer. Counselling in regard to adult education should also be available. The above recommendations would make it possible for adult educators to contribute to the rehabilitation of the disabled.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,003
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Qualitatif · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,003
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,016

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0030,006
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0010,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0020,001
Communication savante0,0020,001
Science ouverte0,0000,002
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0030,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,005
Tête enseignante GPT0,221
Écart entre enseignants0,216 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeQualitatif
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2010
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revuecIRcle (University of British Columbia)Même sujetDisability Education and EmploymentTravaux en français237 207