MétaCan
Menu
← Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2302311700 · doi:10.14288/1.0098945

The development of personal empowerment : a qualitative study of the experience of master’s nursing student

2008· article· en· W2302311700 sur OpenAlexaff
Linda Chow

Notice bibliographique

RevuecIRcle (University of British Columbia) · 2008
Typearticle
Langueen
DomainePsychology
ThématiqueResilience and Mental Health
Établissements canadiensUniversity of British Columbia
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésPersonal developmentEmpowermentNursingQualitative researchPsychologyMedical educationPedagogyMedicineSociologyPolitical science

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

The development of personal empowerment in nursing students is thought to be a critical element not only in the promotion of a positive personal and professional self-image among graduate nurses, but also in the advancement of the nursing profession. This study was designed to explore and describe the experiences of master's nursing students with the aim of adding to the knowledge and understanding of the development of personal empowerment in graduate level nursing education. The qualitative method of ethnography was used to conduct this study. Data were collected through formal interviews, informal interviews, and observations of master's nursing students within the settings related to teaching/learning experiences. The majority of the data were collected through 27 semi-structured interviews that were conducted with 13 informants. Ten of these informants were full-time, currently-enrolled students, and three of the informants were full-time students who had graduated from the program with the past year. Data collection and analysis were conducted simultaneously. The process of data analysis gave rise to themes that were clarified and validated by the informants and gave direction to the construction of the informants' accounts of their experiences. All of the students described themselves as having been personally empowered, to varying degrees, as a result of their experiences in the master's nursing program. They perceived that they had acquired knowledge and skills that would contribute to the achievement of their professional goals. Further, by being successful in the program, they had developed a positive self-concept that was associated with a sense of being able to take control under difficult circumstances and overcome adversity. However, most of the informant also perceived that the level to which they had been empowered was limited by the excessive pain of some of their experiences in the program. Often, these negative experiences tended to overshadow the more positive experiences and to color the students' perceptions of their experiences as master's nursing students in a negative way. The data revealed that the development of personal empowerment is, ultimately, the result of a collaborative effort between and among master's nursing students and nursing faculty. First, students, themselves, have the capacity to promote their own sense of personal empowerment through constructive adaptive strategies directed toward acquiring knowledge and skills and toward coping with adversity. These strategies often necessitate reflection on personal beliefs, values, and assumptions; they often require a shift in students' perceptions of self in relation to the experience of being a master's nursing student. Second, supportive peer relationships, build on mutual trust and respect, are important in promoting both professional and personal growth. And third, the nursing faculty play a critical role instructuring learning experiences and fostering collegial, caring relationships that nurture the students' development of personal empowerment. The research findings have implications for nursing education and nursing research such that the development of personal empowerment in nursing education will be enhanced.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,013
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,014
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Qualitatif · Signal consensuel: Qualitatif
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,013
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,067

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0130,014
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,001
Bibliométrie0,0010,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0090,010
Communication savante0,0040,005
Science ouverte0,0020,006
Intégrité de la recherche0,0020,003
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0020,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,042
Tête enseignante GPT0,340
Écart entre enseignants0,298 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeQualitatif
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2008
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revuecIRcle (University of British Columbia)→Même sujetResilience and Mental Health→Travaux en français237 207→