MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2302480850 · doi:10.1182/blood.v122.21.821.821

A New Form Of Therapeutic Resistance: Drug Glucuronidation Regulated By The Sonic Hedgehog Factor Gli1

2013· article· en· W2302480850 sur OpenAlexaff
Hiba Ahmad Zahreddine, Biljana Culjkovic‐Kraljacic, Sarit Assouline, Abdellatif Amri, Patrick Gendron, Andrea A. Romeo, Stephen Morris, James B. Jaquith, Gregory Cormack, Eftihia Cocolakis, Julie Bergeron, Leandro Cerchietti, Brian Leber, Wilson H. Miller, Katherine L. B. Borden

Notice bibliographique

RevueBlood · 2013
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
ThématiqueHedgehog Signaling Pathway Studies
Établissements canadiensMcGill UniversityAegera Therapeutics (Canada)Jewish General HospitalHôpital Maisonneuve-RosemontUniversité de MontréalMcMaster University Medical CentreInstitute for Research in Immunology and Cancer
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésEIF4EBiologyCancer researchRibavirinDrug resistanceInitiation factorPharmacologyTranslation (biology)GeneBiochemistryGeneticsMessenger RNA

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Abstract Despite many recent successes in the treatment of cancer, the development of chemoresistance in many of the initially responding patients, and primary resistance in others, remains a major impediment in therapy development. Our studies provide evidence for a novel mechanism underlying drug resistance: Gli1 dependent drug glucuronidation. While carrying out a Phase II clinical trial of targeting the eukaryotic translation initiation factor eIF4E with ribavirin in M4/M5 subtypes of AML, we observed that all responding patients eventually became clinically and molecularly resistant. To understand the cause of this resistance, we generated ribavirin resistant cell lines. In these models, ribavirin no longer targeted eIF4E activity or impaired growth, and importantly, the ability of ribavirin to bind eIF4E was severely impaired. However, the eIF4E gene was not mutated and its protein levels were not altered. The cell lines could be divided into two groups: type I with a defect in drug uptake and type II with a normal uptake. In type I resistant cells, we observed a substantial reduction in levels of Adenosine Kinase (ADK) an enzyme that catalyzes the rate limiting step in the metabolic activation of ribavirin allowing its retention in the cells. We used RNA Sequencing to examine the molecular underpinnings of type II resistance. Our data revealed a drastic increase in the levels of Gli1. In stably overexpressing cells, Gli1 was sufficient to produce the same resistance phenotype that we observed for type II cell models, both molecularly and at the level of cell growth. In addition, Gli1 overexpression correlated with the loss of drug-to-target interaction, as observed by our eIF4E immunoprecipitation studies using 3H-Ribavirin, similarly to the resistant cell lines. Conversely, Gli1 knockdown in type II cells or its pharmacological inhibition with the FDA approved Gli1 inhibitor GDC0449/Vismodegib, restored the eIF4E-ribavirin interaction and re-sensitized these cells to ribavirin. Our subsequent studies revealed a close correlation between Gli1 expression and the protein levels of the UGT1A glucuronosyl transferase enzymes involved in phase II drug metabolism whereby xenobiotics or metabolites are modified by the addition of a sugar, glucuronic acid. Given these findings, we examined whether the loss of the eIF4E interaction in resistant cells was due to the glucuronidation of ribavirin. Using 13C/12C ribavirin and mass spectrometry, we observed glucuronidated forms of ribavirin in resistant cells and cells overexpressing Gli1 but not in parental cells and that ribavirin is glucuronidated on its triazole ring which binds eIF4E. Treatment of cells with the Gli1 inhibitor GDC0449 reduces UGT1A levels, and correlates with reduced levels of ribavirin-glucuronides and the re-emergence of ribavirin-eIF4E complexes. We further hypothesized that the type II resistant cells could be resistant to other drugs. We observe that our ribavirin resistant cell lines are also resistant to the cornerstone of AML therapy, cytarabine. GDC0449/Vismodegib treatment reverts resistance to cytarabine in these cells. Preliminary studies indicate that these cells are also resistant to azacytidine and cisplatin. This is particularly striking as these cells were never exposed to these compounds. Thus, this could represent a novel form of multi-drug resistance. To establish the clinical relevance of our findings to patients in our AML ribavirin trial, we examined features of type I and type II resistance. Out of 10 patient samples available for evaluation, all six responding patient specimens showed elevated Gli-1 mRNA levels, up to 26 fold, upon relapse relative to levels during response. For most, the ratio of Gli1 during response relative to at relapse was about 2-4 fold with some patients up to 10 fold. For the two patients examined that did not respond, both had highly elevated Gli-1 levels prior to treatment relative to healthy individuals, and this was not lowered after 28 days of ribavirin treatment. We also noted elevated UGT1A protein levels upon relapse in our patient population. Type I resistance was observed in only two patients whereas Gli1 and UGT1A were dysregulated at relapse in all patients examined. In summary, we identified a novel form of drug resistance: Gli1 dependent drug glucuronidation. Treatment with Gli1 inhibitors appears to be a promising avenue for overcoming this form of drug resistance. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Expérimental (laboratoire) · Signal consensuel: Expérimental (laboratoire)
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,008
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,417

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,009
Tête enseignante GPT0,220
Écart entre enseignants0,212 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeExpérimental (laboratoire)
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2013
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueBloodMême sujetHedgehog Signaling Pathway StudiesTravaux en français237 207