Notice bibliographique
Résumé
The Edmontonians pulled off a terrific 2008 conference that had all the elements: great science, insightful overviews, vigorous debates and lovely evening events.It was the kind of session that makes the CUA meeting so appealing: open and honest dialogue, free of rancour and marketing hype, and a collegial attempt to air honest differences and points of view.Dr. Metcalfe, the scientific and local organizing committees, and the Central Office staff are to be congratulated.2008/09 will be a year of consolidation of the fundamental changes in the organization of the CUA over the past 3 years.We have a new contractual relationship with the Central Office, which should ensure fiscal accountability and permit ongoing oversight of the functioning of the office by the CUA executive.We have a new director of the Office of Education, Ms. Tiffany Pizioli, who has a mandate to increase the activity and profile of the office.The CUA is accredited by the Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada as a provider of Continuing Professional Development (CPD) activities.As such, the CUA is able to review and provide certification of Section 1 and 3 Learning Activities, as defined by the Royal College.We encourage anyone interested in organizing a Section 1 or 3 Learning Activity to contact the CUA Office of Education (tiffany.pizioli@cua.org).We have our journal, CUAJ, whose articles are now listed and searchable on PubMed.In addition to the editorial board, which is responsible for scientific content and direction, we will work to establish a publishing committee that reports to the CUA executive, to look after the business side of the journal.The CUA has been extremely fortunate to have had highly visionary and capable leadership over the past 5 years.In particular, Yves Fradet and Michael Jewett deserve credit for implementing the Central Office arrangement; Luc Valiquette deserves recognition for managing the initiation of CUAJ, and Jim Metcalfe for overseeing the new arrangement with the SIU Central Office.Going forward, we are particularly lucky to have Denis Lavoie as secretary and Stuart Oake as treasurer.These 2 men are solid as rocks and will make the job of president much easier.The shift to a professional, nonvolunteer Central Office has, as expected, resulted in the organizational maturation of the CUA.This process, however, raises some fundamental questions about the direction and mission of the CUA, such as: What services should the CUA provide to its members?What are the goals of the annual meeting?How should it be structured to achieve this?How will we meet the challenges resulting from the profound changes in urological practice that are just beginning?How should the Office of Education interact with urologists and with the pharmaceutical industy?Should the CUA take on a more political role, as the AUA does?To help the association answer these questions, we intend to establish a long-range strategic planning initiative this year.We'll keep you posted as this process unfolds.It is a great privilege to serve the CUA as president.To facilitate this demanding role, I have handed over the leadership of several of my responsibilities to others during my term.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,025 | 0,048 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,006 | 0,005 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,007 | 0,007 |
| Communication savante | 0,021 | 0,019 |
| Science ouverte | 0,004 | 0,010 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,013 | 0,012 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,051 | 0,015 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».