MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2302590942 · doi:10.1093/pch/13.7.595

Education: A child's right and our responsibility

2008· article· en· W2302590942 sur OpenAlexaffabout
Savithiri Ratnapalan

Notice bibliographique

RevuePaediatrics & Child Health · 2008
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineHealth Professions
ThématiqueChild and Adolescent Health
Établissements canadiensUniversity of Toronto
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésTest (biology)MedicineGirlAsthmaPediatricsExacerbationPsychologyDevelopmental psychology

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

It was the usual busy emergency department shift, and I went in to see a 14-year-old boy with an asthma exacerbation and upper respiratory infection. After the medical history, I asked him, “Which grade are you in?”, and he said, “Grade 9”. I asked him how much school he has missed, and he said one week. When I asked, “How are you doing at school?” He said, “Fine”. When I asked him what were the marks for his last math test, he started telling me how unwell he has been for the past couple of weeks, the sorry school system that does not care for students and that his math teacher was a mean person. I smiled and told him that I was expecting a number and not a lecture. He laughed and said his mark was a four out of 10, and proceeded with the rest of the story. He had been admitted for appendicitis the past month and had been in hospital for five days. When he went back to school after one week, everything was new and he has not been able to catch up; the math test was the last thing he needed. The teacher had suggested a retake, but he caught a cold in the past week; his asthma got worse, so he stayed home for the whole week. He came to the hospital to get treatment for his asthma exacerbation and to get a note for school. I wrote a detailed note to the school explaining that the youth may need some extra help to catch up. I told the boy that he should start going back to school, and suggested that he and his mother speak to the guidance councillor; I gave him my office number in case he needed any further encouragement to go to school. I also wondered if this youth could have received some educational help earlier to ease the transition from hospital to school. According to the World Health Organization, “child rights are fundamental freedoms and the inherent rights of all human beings below the age of 18. These rights apply to every child, irrespective of the child's, parent's/legal guardian's race, colour, sex, creed or other status” (1). One of these rights is the right to ‘education and access to appropriate information'. The question is, ‘Who is responsible for that?’ In Canada, primary and secondary education is free for all children, and the law requires all children younger than 16 years of age to attend school. However, when a child becomes ill, he or she is usually kept at home and comes to the attention of the health care team if he or she does not get better within a few days. Most schools ask for a doctor's note if a child needs to stay home for more than three days. Some acutely ill children and some chronically ill children need care in hospital, often for a short period of time (less than three days) or occasionally longer. Each illness leads to loss of school days and loss of education for these children. The sick children may have lost a few days of school before seeing a member of the health care team, more days if hospitalization is required and more days if further convalescence is needed at home before returning to school. The attention of the medical team in the hospital is focused on helping the child get better to send him or her home. The role of the child as a student and the impact of loss of school days on learning is sometimes forgotten. A child who has recently recovered from an acute illness or is dealing with a chronic illness and has missed several days of schooling may have a hard time adjusting to class. In an attempt to support the educational needs of ill children, some paediatric hospitals have teachers who provide small group or one-on-one teaching either in a hospital classroom or at the bedside. These teachers not only support learning, but also give hope to some patients and their families that the illness is not going to make ‘life go away’ as one teenager expressed. The teachers liaise with the school and help the student catch up on missed work so that returning to school is easier. However, not all children have this opportunity. Many hospitals do not have teachers. Even in hospitals with teachers, children may not be referred to the program for multiple reasons including severity of illness, the reluctance of the child or family to have the teacher, oversight from the health care team and/or a limited number of teachers and too many patients. Children who are recurrently ill at home or in hospitals, in which access to a teacher is none or limited, lose many school days. Raising the awareness in the medical community, followed by advocacy on the part of physicians, could help overcome some of these problems and could facilitate an earlier and smoother return to school. Anecdotally, the teachers who I have contacted regarding recently hospitalized or chronically ill children have gone above and beyond their call of duty to accommodate the children and provide remedial help. A high school teacher at The Hospital for Sick Children (Toronto, Ontario) noted that the doctor's letter helps them not only to understand the child's need for extra help, but is also used to document their reasons for repeating examinations or for allowing extra time for completion of assignments. I suggest that all health care professionals caring for children and school-age youth take responsibility to ensure that the education of children and youth occurs even when they are set back by illness. We should learn to ask and document simple questions such as, ‘Which grade are you in?, ‘When did you last go to school?’ and ‘How are you doing at school?’. All hospitalized children and youth should have a back-to-school plan when discharged home. When children or youth are admitted to hospital for more than a couple of days, we should involve a teacher if possible. The patient and family should be encouraged to contact the school early and work out an arrangement for catch-up schoolwork. Hospitals admitting children and youth that do not have teachers should explore the possibility of having teachers or volunteers to help admitted children with schoolwork, as well as lobbying local school boards for help in solving this access problem. Sometimes all it takes for the process to start is for the doctor to ask about school. Education may be a child's right, but it will not be implemented if all adults, including doctors, do not take the responsibility to ensure that every child exercises that right.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,010
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,023
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Commentaire · Signal consensuel: Commentaire
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,031
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,100

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0100,023
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,001
Bibliométrie0,0010,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0180,015
Communication savante0,0100,012
Science ouverte0,0020,015
Intégrité de la recherche0,0080,028
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0300,007

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,031
Tête enseignante GPT0,376
Écart entre enseignants0,345 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreCommentaire

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2008
Routes d'admission2
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revuePaediatrics & Child HealthMême sujetChild and Adolescent HealthTravaux en français237 207