MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2304023336

An Outline of Swine Diseases: A Handbook, 2nd ed.

2002· article· en· W2304023336 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Robert Friendship

Notice bibliographique

RevueEurope PMC (PubMed Central) · 2002
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineImmunology and Microbiology
ThématiqueMicrobial infections and disease research
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésAudience measurementDiseaseMedicineBiosecurityIntensive care medicinePolitical sciencePathology
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

It would appear that cost was a primary consideration in creating this text. The book is a small and simple handbook (no photographs or illustrations) that provides a point-form review of pig diseases. The book is divided into 10 chapters. Chapter 1 touches on the veterinarian's role, namely, the concept of biosecurity and minimal disease, and discusses vaccine and drug use; it is directed to an American readership, so some of this material relative to drug use reviews American rules and regulations and is not directly relevant to Canadian veterinarians. The following 2 chapters consist of pointform summaries of diseases grouped according to body systems, with chapter 2 devoted to polysystemic diseases. The final chapter lists diseases caused by toxic agents and is the largest chapter in the book. Toxicity problems tend to be rare in modern confinement pig farming, and so it is surprising that they receive this much attention from the authors. Diseases are presented with the usual headings of etiology, epidemiology, pathogenesis, clinical signs, diagnosis, treatment, prevention, and control. Typical of this type of handbook, each disease receives about equal space. The drawback to this approach is that the reader may find it difficult to determine which diseases are important and which are either very rare or nonsignificant. The authors have done a thorough job and have included several recent diseases not listed in their 1st edition, including postweaning multisystemic wasting syndrome. There are a few relatively common diseases that are not covered, possibly because the authors considered them to be not very important. Under integumentary diseases, for example, pityriasis rosae and ringworm are not mentioned, but swine pox is. This text would have been more useful as a study guide or veterinary manual had the authors included tables or charts. The differential diagnosis of swine diseases is generally aided by knowing the age or production group affected, the pattern of spread, and other key points of history or clinical signs. A chart showing how the various diseases could be differentiated on this basis also would have helped pull the information together. Streptococcal meningitis, for example, is listed under polysystemic diseases and not neurological diseases. I think someone using this book as a quick reference might miss a likely rule-out, such as streptococcal meningitis by scanning the chapter relating to the body system. The authors do not reference their work but they do provide a list of suggested readings after some of the disease entries. The information provided in the book is accurate and up-to-date, but is not extensive. The scope of the book is similar to other disease guides currently available, including: Pig Diseases by David Taylor (Burlington Press), Swine Disease Manual by C.E. Whiteman and R.D. Glock (University of Colorado), and A Pocket Guide to Recognizing and Treating Pig Diseases by M.R. Muirhead and T.J.L. Alexander (5M Enterprises Inc.). Cowart and Casteel do not attempt to deal with the complexities of swine practice, such as the interaction of disease, management, and the environment, and do not discuss production records or economics. Therefore, veterinarians in swine practice are likely to be disappointed by the limited depth of the book, but for the mixed practitioner who rarely deals with pigs, this book may be a useful guide. The main readership is likely to be undergraduate veterinary students preparing for board examinations or anyone else wishing a quick review of pig diseases.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesCharge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
Catégories consensuellesCharge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,601
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0080,001

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,019
Tête enseignante GPT0,243
Écart entre enseignants0,224 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; les deux têtes enseignantes s’accordent sur ce qui est montré ici.

Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations4
Publié2002
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueEurope PMC (PubMed Central)Même sujetMicrobial infections and disease researchTravaux en français237 207