MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2305972668

The American Whiskey Renaissance: The Rebirth of an American Spirit

2015· article· en· W2305972668 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Charles A. Rarick, Claudia C. Mich

Notice bibliographique

RevueJournal of the International Academy of Case Studies · 2015
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineBusiness, Management and Accounting
ThématiqueWine Industry and Tourism
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésPopularityTreasuryRevenueExciseGovernment (linguistics)EconomicsEconomic historyAdvertisingLawAgricultural economicsBusinessPolitical scienceFinance
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

INTRODUCTION Whiskey making has a long history in the United States. Even President George Washington owned a distillery. In the early days of American making, many distillers were farmers who also produced and sold as a source of additional income. In 1791, the U.S. Secretary of the Treasury, Alexander Hamilton, placed a 25% tax on distillers in order to generate revenue for the young country. Most of these distillers were operating small production facilities and many were located in Pennsylvania. They greatly objected to a tax imposed by the federal government. By 1794 the hostility grew into a rebellion, called Whiskey Rebellion which caused the federal government to send troops to enforce the tax (video). The result was the relocation of distillers to the West, most notably to Kentucky. Over time was being produced in a number of states, including Tennessee which produced the famous Jack Daniel's brand. The popularity of grew over the years and reached its heyday in the 1950s in the U.S., but soon the drink lost popularity and sales declined. During the past decade American has experienced a renaissance, both in the United States and internationally. Whiskey is once again a popular drink and that popularity is growing exponentially in foreign markets. Whiskey producers have expanded capacity and new entrants have entered the market. Whiskey distillers in the United States can now be found from Alaska to Florida, many producing popular small batch lines. The general feeling in the industry is that this popularity will continue, however, it is yet to be seen if this surge will be long-lasting or simply a fad. WHISKEY, BOURBON, OR SCOTCH? The word whiskey, or whisky, has a Gaelic origin meaning of life. There is often some confusion about the differences among (or whisky), bourbon, and scotch. In the end they are all but their contents and location of production make them different products. They are all alcoholic drinks distilled with grain. While there are a number of nuances that make each different, the main differences can be briefly summarized. As far as the difference in spelling, the term whiskey is used for products produced in the United States and Ireland, and whisky is used for products produced in Canada and Scotland. Bourbon, by law, must be produced in the United States, and most of it is produced in the state of Kentucky. Since bourbon can only be made in the United States, the drink is sometimes referred to America's whiskey. Bourbon must be produced from a mash of at least 51% corn, distilled at a level no higher than 160 proof, stored in new charred oak barrels, and aged for a minimum of two years (although most bourbon is aged longer). Tennessee Whiskey is not bourbon and has its own legal requirements. While similar to the requirements of bourbon, Tennessee Whiskey must be made in the state of Tennessee and be charcoaled filtered using sugar maple charcoal. Scotch is a produced in Scotland and malted barley as the main ingredient. All goes through a six-step process which includes preparation, mashing, fermenting, distilling, aging, and bottling (Figure 1). The preparation phase involves crushing and then cooking grain. The mashing process adds water to the crushed grain. Fermentation involves adding yeast, which converts to alcohol and through distillation, the alcohol is turned into a vapor. Water is added to the vapor runoff and stored in barrels for aging. After the has aged to the desired number of years it is then bottled and is ready for sale. Unlike some spirits, requires aging and therefore has a long lead time between production and availability for sale. A ten-year bottle of requires ten years of aging. While some blending of younger and older is not an uncommon practice, ramping up production still requires years until the product is ready for sale (video). …

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,135
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,338

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,001
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0010,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,065
Tête enseignante GPT0,339
Écart entre enseignants0,274 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations4
Publié2015
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueJournal of the International Academy of Case StudiesMême sujetWine Industry and TourismTravaux en français237 207