Probing the Surface Area of Nickel Catalyst Materials: The Effect of Oxalate Adsorption on the Electrochemistry of Nickel in Basic Media
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
INTRODUCTION Nickel and nickel-based materials find widespread applications as secondary battery anodes, supercapacitors, electro-catalysts, photocatalysts, and photovoltaic cell components (e.g., [1]-[3]). In alkaline media, nickel-based electrodes are effective catalysts for the hydrogen and oxygen evolution reactions (HER, OER), by which hydrogen may be renewably produced as fuel or industrial feedstock. However, accurate methods to measure the electrochemically active surface area (ECSA) for nickel-based electrodes have not yet been established [4]. The ECSA directly affects the catalytic activity and electrode capacitance, hence, a reliable method for the measurement of the ESCA is desirable. In this work, a new method to probe the surface area of metallic nickel electrodes utilizing voltammetry will be presented. The results are compared to alternative ECSA measurement techniques in terms of accuracy, precision and practical applications for nickel-based catalyst materials. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION Ni electrodes were mechanically polished using 320 grit SiC paper, 9 and 3 μm polycrystalline diamond pastes and a 50 nm Al2O3 suspension. Electrochemical measurements were collected in 0.1 or 1 M KOH with and without the addition of 0.001 M – 0.1 M K2C2O4. In comparison with a forward voltammetric sweep in an electrolyte containing only KOH, the addition of oxalate anions to the solution has no observed effect on the voltammetry of metallic nickel in the hydrogen evolution reaction (HER) or the Ni/Ni(II) oxidation potential regions (< 1.3 VRHE). This result is similar to those reported for several other organic additives [5]. However, whereas literature evidence shows that at higher potentials many organic additives oxidize at a diffusion-limited rate, oxalate anions do not show the expected oxidation current. Instead, we observe that the Ni(II)/Ni(III) oxidation peak, normally at ~1.45 VRHE, occurs at lower potentials (1.35 – 1.40 VRHE). Further, in the presence of sufficiently high concentrations of oxalate anions, the Ni(II)/Ni(III) oxidation peak is very sharp, with full widths at half maxima (FWHMs) less than 20 mV. The voltammetric peak characteristics, i.e., the peak position, width and area, have been measured at various concentrations of oxalate and at various potential sweep rates. The peak position is very sensitive to the electrode’s surface state. However, the peak width and area are very reproducible. The practical result of the present work is that we now have a sharp voltammetric peak that is well-separated from concurrent electrochemical processes, in particular the OER, which typically onsets near 1.45 - 1.5 VRHE. The electrical charge associated with this oxidation peak is consistent with a process involving a monolayer. The implementation of these results for measuring the ECSA of metallic nickel electrodes has been tested by conducting voltammetry on different electrode preparation regimes, which ranged from a rough polish to a mirror finish. The validity of this characterization method will be discussed and the results will be compared with alternative methods [6]. The extension of this work to characterizing nickel-based catalyst materials will be discussed. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This work was supported by National Research Council Canada (NRC), the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC) and the University of Ottawa. REFERENCES 1. D. Chade, L. Berlouis, D. Infield, A. Cruden, P. T. Nielsen and T. Mathiesen, Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 38, 14380 (2013). 2. Y. Miao, L. Ouyang, S. Zhou, L. Xu, Z. Yang, M. Xiao and R. Ouyang, Biosens. Bioelectron., 53, 428 (2014). 3. Y. Wang, S. Gai, N. Niu, F. He and P. Yang, J. Mater. Chem. A, 1, 9083 (2013). 4. D. S. Hall, C. Bock and B. R. MacDougall, J. Electrochem. Soc., 160, F235 (2013). 5. M. Fleischmann, K. Korinek and D. Pletcher, J. Electroanal. Chem. Interfacial Electrochem., 31, 39 (1971). 6. S. Trasatti and O. A. Petrii, J. Electroanal. Chem., 327, 353 (1992).
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».