Psycho-social aspects of tuberculosis : a study of cases in a low income group in a selected area of Vancouver
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
This study examines the psycho-social aspects of tuberculosis in a low income group in an urban setting. The locale chosen was Social Area Three of the City of Vancouver. Part of this area known as the "Strathcona District" was surveyed in 1947 by a University of British Columbia team, of which the writer was a member, as part of a demonstration slum clearance project. This group was specially selected to give clearer focus to the important "residual area" problem in tuberculosis control, namely, that large group of the tuberculous in whom the interaction of the emotional aspects of illness and defects in their material environment combine to make them the hard core of the tuberculosis problem and of many other social problems in the community. A general perspective for the study is drawn from tuberculosis and social work literature from North America, Britain and Scandinavia. The details of the study are based on the case records of seventy-nine people aged eighteen to fifty who were almost one hundred per cent of the diagnosed cases of active tuberculosis in the white races living in Social Area Three of Vancouver in August, 1948. The case list was compiled from the files of the public health .nurses of the Metropolitan Health Committee. The Social Service Exchange registrations of patients and their families were followed up and a total of one hundred and eighty seven case records were read. Information from home interviews with selected patients was also utilized. In terms of social characteristics the sample includes; (a) patients in family settings and, (b) unattached men living alone, who numbered one quarter of the group. The group as a whole were near the border-line income brackets, but might never have Become social liabilities but for their tuberculosis. The problems presented by the disease to the patient as an individual, to his family and to the community are then discussed. The importance of the personality of the patient as a factor in illness is stressed, and the role of the medical social worker in diagnosis and treatment is outlined. Illustrative case material is utilized. The study indicates that the three most important factors determining the successful management of tuberculosis are: (a) the existence of facilities for finding, treating and rehabilitating cases, (b) adequate ancillary social services for the treatment of the social aspects of the disease, (c) the degree of cooperation of the patient and his family in the treatment plan, which cooperation is largely determined by their degree of emotional maturity. The problem of patient non-cooperation is found to stem mainly from lack of sufficient services to meet primary human needs. Because of this lack the life experiences of most people in the group in their formative years had not been conducive to the development of the requisite emotional maturity for dealing constructively with the problems of chronic illness. There is evidence that the weakness of the rehabilitation services in British Columbia vitiates much of the excellence of other treatment facilities. The principle conclusion drawn from the evidence is that the prevention and control of tuberculosis are inextricably interwoven with many other social problems, including poverty, bad housing and family insecurity, which must be attacked in their entirety if advances in tuberculosis control are to be continued. Poverty, in particular, shows up its paramount importance in the perpetuation of tuberculosis as a major health and welfare problem. Specific recommendations are made regarding changes in legislation, medical services, medical social work, social assistance, rehabilitation services and voluntary social agencies services. Many of these recommendations would have valid application in the treatment of other chronic illnesses.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,002 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,002 | 0,003 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,005 | 0,002 |
| Communication savante | 0,002 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».