Status of the Western Small-footed Bat (Myotis ciliolabrum) in Alberta /
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Every five years, the Fish and Wildlife Division of Alberta Sustainable Resource Development reviews the general status of wildlife species in Alberta.These overviews, which have been conducted in 1991 ( The Status of Alberta Wildlife ), 1996 ( The Status of Alberta Wildlife ), 2000 ( The General Status of Alberta Wild Species 2000), and 2005 ( The General Status of Alberta Wild Species 2005) assign individual species "ranks" that reflect the perceived level of risk to populations that occur in the province.Such designations are determined from extensive consultations with professional and amateur biologists, and from a variety of readily available sources of population data.A key objective of these reviews is to identify species that may be considered for more detailed status determinations.The Alberta Wildlife Status Report Series is an extension of the general status exercise, and provides comprehensive current summaries of the biological status of selected wildlife species in Alberta.Priority is given to species that are At Risk or May Be At Risk in the province, that are of uncertain status ( Undetermined ), or that are considered to be at risk at a national level by the Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada (COSEWIC).Reports in this series are published and distributed by the Alberta Conservation Association and the Fish and Wildlife Division of Alberta Sustainable Resource Development.They are intended to provide detailed and up-to-date information that will be useful to resource professionals for managing populations of species and their habitats in the province.The reports are also designed to provide current information that will assist Alberta's Endangered Species Conservation Committee in identifying species that may be formally designated as Endangered or Threatened under Alberta's Wildlife Act.To achieve these goals, the reports have been authored and/or reviewed by individuals with unique local expertise in the biology and management of each species.iii EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Western small-footed bats (Myotis ciliolabrum ) are widely distributed and locally common in western North America.They are at the northern limit of their distribution in Alberta, where they are confined to prairie river valleys where badlands or clay cutbanks provide suitable roosting habitat, and adjacent riparian woodlands provide foraging habitat.Their limited distribution has resulted in a conservation ranking of Sensitive in Alberta.Western small-footed bats are highly saxicolous (residing in rock crevices), having greater roost specificity than other residential prairie bat species, which are more often found in buildings.In Alberta, during the reproductive period, western small-footed bats roost in cavities in badland clay banks and rock crevices, selecting maternity roosts based on thermal properties.Winter acoustic records have demonstrated overwintering in Dinosaur Provincial Park, at the Atlas Coal Mine area near East Coulee, and in Dry Island Buffalo Jump Provincial Park.The bats presumably hibernate in deep crevices.Gene flow is diminished across long stretches of unsuitable habitat.Genetic analyses show that there is a regional Alberta population distinct from that further south in Montana.Distinct subpopulations, with restricted gene flow, occur within and between rivers in the province.Males and females both show philopatry to their natal area and males do not disperse further than females.During the summer, individuals cluster in family units.Loss of prairie riparian cottonwood stands, used by bats as foraging habitat, may negatively affect population numbers of this species in the province.This species' dependency on riparian trees needs further investigation.Habitat loss for this species could also occur by direct flooding caused by dams on the lower reaches of the rivers in southern Alberta.Reproductive rates of western small-footed bats are significantly lower than for big brown and little brown bats, which are two sympatric but more widespread species.Potential population isolation, limited area of distribution, and low reproductive rate make local subpopulations vulnerable to local extirpation.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,006 | 0,002 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».