Written as I Remember It: Teachings (ʔəms taʔaw) from the life of a Sliammon elder
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Written as I Remember It: Teachings (?ems ta?aw) from life of a Sliammon elder Elsie Paul, in collaboration with Paige Raibmon and Harmony Johnson Vancouver, British Columbia: UBC Press, 2015, 488 pages ISBN: 978-0-7748-2711-9 (paperback) So That S How Important Roots Were our People (p. 155) The epigraph that Sliammon elder Elsie Paul speaks in her book Written as I Remember It dovetails with First Nations' understanding of lifelong learning journey. Sources and domains of knowledge ground a learner and understood as roots that sustain a learner, represented in stylized graphic of a tree (Canadian Council on Learning, 2007). Paul identifies these sources and domains of knowledge in her teachings. One of book's collaborators, Paige Raibmon, refers these as Paul's of identity (p. 40), and Raibmon, Paul, and Paul's granddaughter, Harmony Johnson, use stories provide a nuanced interpretation of these categories--they roots, nests where knowledge resides, grows, and changes. The categories repurposed as on ideas, values, and intentions (p. 42). Elders pass them on listeners like Raibmon and Johnson with that they live according messages in them. I conceive of stories in Written as I Remember It as sources and domains of knowledge because Raibmon says enduring tradition or culture not necessarily located in physical practices ... or in texts and artifacts (p. 42) where standard education systems teach find knowledge. For me as an educator, book an opportunity analyze what I learn from each of Paul's sources and domains of knowledge and take them with me on my lifelong learning journey because authors want to take in not only content of her [Paul's] words but method and intention (p. 5). Ancestors' teachings help ... get your strength, your power be who you are (p. 68). After Raibmon provides context and locates book in literature on British Columbia history, Indigenous education, and anthropological investigations, Paul proceeds set up sources and domains of knowledge in which her stories nest. Her stories cover self-care, work, respect, land and place, and family. Any gaps readers notice may serve as touchstones further research with Paul and other knowledgeable Sliammon. We see how stories have an impact on spiritual and cultural, social, economic, and political spheres (First Nations Holistic Lifelong Learning Model, 2007) of Paul's life. Paul's motivation for her work her family, as she argues that it's very important pass on my children, my grandchildren ... strong beliefs that my grandparents had, that there a spiritual world ... [and] that what grounds us (p. 389). Paul's lessons shape methods of Indigenous learning that Raibmon asks contemplate as we read. Paul says taught by your Elders how take care of yourself' (pp. 68-69). Elders share with you the true of land that is never talked about (p. 79). In these stories, we see revised histories of contemporary B.C. places from families who lived in them. Powell River, Cape Mudge, Brem River, Theodosia, Okeover Inlet, Grace Harbour, Bella Bella, Bute Inlet, Egmont, and Rivers Inlet communities that come up often in her stories. On land, it's really important just share your history ... how you grew up ... what things were like in my grandmother's time, and stories how things were in my great-grandparents' time (pp. …
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,003 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,012 | 0,007 |
| Communication savante | 0,006 | 0,004 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,006 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,005 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,011 | 0,003 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».