MétaCan
Menu
← Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2308813866 · doi:10.14288/1.0091084

Eating disorder nutrition counselling in Canada

2009· article· en· W2308813866 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Jadine Cairns

Notice bibliographique

RevuecIRcle (University of British Columbia) · 2009
Typearticle
Langueen
DomainePsychology
ThématiqueEating Disorders and Behaviors
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésEating disordersPsychologyMedicinePsychiatryEnvironmental healthGeography

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

An eating disorder is considered a 'mental' or psychiatric disorder with potentially severe physical consequences. The optimal treatment for eating disordered individuals is multi-disciplinary and multi-dimensional. Nutrition counseling is an integral part of the eating disorder treatment process, but the actual practice of nutrition counseling has yet to be defined. American eating disorder dietetic manuals describe nutrition therapist as the optimal way to support this client group. A nutrition therapist would delve into process-oriented strategies whereas; a nutrition educator would work strictly with didactic and content oriented strategies. Given the absence of information on Canadian eating disorder dietetic practice and how dietitians are being prepared to work in this area, this study aims to rectify these gaps in knowledge. The goals of this study were to ascertain the counseling practices and explore the educational needs of dietitians in Canada who worked with eating disordered individuals in order to optimize the treatment for this population group. The literature for nutrition counseling was reviewed and a list of 50 counseling strategies was compiled. Surveys based on these 50 strategies were developed and mailed to 138 Canadian dietitians who worked with eating disordered individuals. The types of strategies explored in this study comprised of assessment, rapport building and behavioural change categories. Within the behavioural change group, strategies can be further divided into instructional, behavioural, cognitive behavioural or motivational strategies. Strategies may also be categorized with respect to being strictly content-oriented or being process oriented. Dietitians were asked to complete the dietitian survey and to pass the therapist survey on to the appropriate member of their eating disorder team. The dietitian survey had a return rate of 56% while the therapist survey had a return rate of 34%. Assessment and rapport building strategies were used frequently by Canadian dietitians. The most frequently used behavioural, change strategies tended to be content-oriented. Dietitians used strategies they were familiar with, strategies they considered useful and strategies within their perceived professional role boundaries. Therapists had a similar view as dietitians on which strategies were useful and which ones were appropriate. The four highest ranked strategies for usage and usefulness were the same. They were: using small increments in goal-setting, involving clients in decision-making, discussing barriers for behavioural change and reflective listening strategies. The strategy usage of Canadian dietitians seem to indicate that they worked in more of a nutrition educator role as opposed to a nutrition therapist role. Overall, the most frequently used route for learning eating disorder nutrition counseling skills was reading. Strategies used in clinical practice were learned from dietetic training and intuition. Seventy-one percent of the dietitians surveyed were dissatisfied or very dissatisfied with the educational opportunities currently available, hence there is a definite need for continuing education opportunities in the area of eating disorder nutrition counseling. At this time, Canadian dietitians do not have access to routes of learning that have been recommended by the American Dietetic Association and dietitians who are leaders in the field of nutrition counseling and eating disorders. These recommendations include more intensive and formal modes of training such as courses and mentorship or supervision programs. Courses and mentorship were also the routes of learning most frequently requested by Canadian dietitians themselves.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Autre · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,067
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,483

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,004
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0010,003
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0070,001
Communication savante0,0020,000
Science ouverte0,0010,001
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0100,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,008
Tête enseignante GPT0,194
Écart entre enseignants0,187 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreAutre

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2009
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revuecIRcle (University of British Columbia)→Même sujetEating Disorders and Behaviors→Travaux en français237 207→