MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2311412832 · doi:10.14288/1.0106592

The recognition and treatment of emotionally disturbed children in grades one to four of a public school system ; a sample survey of the children from twelve Burnaby schools reported by their teachers as maladjusted...

2012· article· en· W2311412832 sur OpenAlexaffabout
Kenneth E. Bell

Notice bibliographique

RevuecIRcle (University of British Columbia) · 2012
Typearticle
Langueen
DomainePsychology
ThématiqueEducational and Psychological Assessments
Établissements canadiensUniversity of British Columbia
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésPsychologySample (material)School systemDevelopmental psychologyMathematics educationClinical psychologyPedagogy

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

The present study is an attempt, on a sample basis, to measure the ability of teachers to recognize and refer for help emotionally disturbed children in their classrooms; the incidence of children recognized as needing help; and the help at present being given children to overcome their maladjustment. The survey was limited to the first four grades because the sooner a child's disturbance is detected, the easier it is to help him overcome it. A basic questionnaire was used for securing information about emotionally disturbed children from teachers in the primary schools in the sample area (Burnaby). Forty-six teachers out of a possible eighty-four reported ninety out of approximately three-thousand children as emotionally disturbed—about three per cent of all the children in grades one to four. An average of two children per teacher were reported. There were seven boys for every two girls. The largest number of children were classified as withdrawn, with only half as many classified as aggressive. Less than one-fifth of the teachers made comments indicating that they were making special efforts to help the children overcome disturbance. As a follow-up, a more detailed study was made of the emotionally disturbed children reported from three schools. Additional information was secured from school progress and health records; from the school social worker, mental health counsellor, and school nurses; and from social agency records. Of the thirty-two children reported from three schools, seven children were in urgent need of casework help, nine of them needed more casework help than they were getting, and the needs for help of the remaining sixteen children were unknown, although they had definite emotional disturbance. Virtually the only casework help given was supplied, in other connections, by social workers from the Social Welfare Branch, the Children's Aid Society of Vancouver, and the Family Welfare Bureau. The teachers had secured special help for less than half of the children that they reported as emotionally disturbed. The school nurses had made some investigation into the problems of fourteen children, four of whom were also under the supervision of the mental health counsellor. None of the children had been called to the attention of the school social worker. Emotionally disturbed children in the three schools surveyed need much more help than they are presently getting. It is probable, that of the ninety children from twelve schools, more than half are in need of intensive casework help. A caseload of forty-five seriously disturbed children, plus forty-five children who need some help, would keep at least one trained caseworker busy all the time. When it is taken into consideration that only the first four grades were covered in the sample survey, and that of the eighty-four teachers in those grades, thirty-eight did not participate, the implication is that in the sample area, there are at least a hundred children needing intensive casework services, and an equal or greater number needing at least some investigation into their problems by the school social worker. Before help can be given disturbed children by the school social worker, the teachers must refer the children as needing help. And then, there must be active co-operation between social worker and teacher, the teacher giving help in the classroom, the social worker in the home. The mental health counsellor is not trained to do casework, but he performs a valuable function in helping teachers to recognize the gravity of various symptoms of emotional disturbance. Unfortunately, the school social worker and mental health counsellor work in different schools. If they were to work in the same schools they would complement one another's efforts and form a valuable team. School nurses are doing an effective job with physical health problems, but they do not appear to be giving emotionally disturbed children needed help, although in most instances they are the only ones asked to give such help. It seems likely that improved attention for children with serious emotional disturbance will come only if social workers are made available, and their services used by the school teachers for children needing help.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: Observationnel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,351
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,947

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,059
Tête enseignante GPT0,253
Écart entre enseignants0,194 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2012
Routes d'admission2
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revuecIRcle (University of British Columbia)Même sujetEducational and Psychological AssessmentsTravaux en français237 207