Evelyn Leslie Hamdon. Islamophobia and the Question of Muslim Identity: The Politics of Difference and Solidarity
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Evelyn Leslie Hamdon. Islamophobia and the Question of Muslim Identity: The Politics of Difference and Solidarity. Winnipeg, MB: Fernwood Publishing, 2010. 112 pp. $17.95 sc. Through an ethnographic case study of coalition building across collective and individual differences, Hamdon examines Muslim group in Edmonton, Canada that came together challenge Islamophobia in their community. Islamophobia and the Question of Muslim Identity: The Politics of Difference and Solidarity is meant to stir conversation (9) bydisrupt ling] stereotypes both within the community and on the part of the dominant community towards those who identify as Muslims (23). Although Hamdon foregrounds the question of Muslim identity, there is much of value others who find themselves in need of negotiating spaces of contested identities. The book is good read for those interested in political activism and/or multicultural studies in general or Islamic studies in particular. The study is set in Canadian post-9/11 context in Edmonton and documents the fledgling efforts of coalition of Muslim organizations. Direct observation, personal interviews, and document analysis were used reconstruct the evolution of the Coalition. Hamdon speaks with emic authority, herself Muslim and a member of the Coalition from the time of its first visioning workshops until it was about one year old (12). Despite her insider status, Hamdon allows the voices of the participants be fully heard in the frequent data bites incorporated throughout the text. In large part, the study is concerned with identity ... how people organize, [and] coalesce across (23) and as result, draws on theories and theories of power. In addition, insights are taken from feminist and antiracist literature, as well as pedagogies of difference. Although the catalytic events of 9/11 and its aftermath gave birth the Coalition, members were motivated negotiate their differences by desire learn about other Muslims, share common experiences, work on common cause and reach out other Canadians. The value of Islarnophobia and the Question of Muslim Identity is not in reasons why the coalition came together but rather in the manner in which the members negotiated across difference of identities find solidarity in purpose. Hamdon takes the reader inside the contested space where coalition members navigated their way through diverse identities, challenged the power of essentialism and represented the complexity and multiplicity of Muslim identities. She foregrounds questions of within power dynamic by critiquing how difference and homogeneity are suppressed or privileged. Although coalitional organizing holds great promise for communities in which complex and intersecting identities and oppressions require expression and redress (61), it is not without personal struggles and varied emotional responses. …
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,003 | 0,002 |
| Communication savante | 0,003 | 0,006 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,002 | 0,003 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,050 | 0,018 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».