Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Figure: Then NIU audiology student Jonathan Javid performed tympanometry and otoacoustic emissions tests on a student from a special education school in Taipei, Taiwan, during the 2010 Heart of Hearing Trip.Each summer, students and faculty with the Northern Illinois University (NIU) Heart of Hearing Humanitarian Research and Service Program go to a different country or region to provide free hearing services to underserved populations.Figure: University of Hong Kong audiology students Cherry Li, far left, and Gloria Ng, far right, along with NIU audiology student Perrine Pham, second from left, conducted play audiometry on an occupant of a residence hall for individuals with special needs.The paradigm for the program is characterized by four elements:Figure: Standing from left, 2012 NIU team members Elizabeth Tusler, Melissa Mandra, Rachel Magann Faivre, and Kasey Twine observed a cochlear implant surgery at University of São Paulo Medical School Clinics Hospital in Brazil. joining forces with audiologists, faculty, and students in the countries visited to provide humanitarian services; connecting with professional organizations in these countries to learn more about their hearing healthcare systems; engaging in cultural immersion activities to gain a better understanding of the people living in the visited countries; and publishing our findings in professional magazines and peer-reviewed journals to raise awareness of hearing healthcare needs in underserved populations. TESTING PROTOCOL Our humanitarian trips usually last for two weeks between the spring and summer semesters. We traveled to Taiwan in 2010, Hong Kong in 2011, Brazil in 2012, and China in 2013.Figure: King ChungOn these trips, we bring our own testing and calibration equipment. In each testing site, we usually perform otoscopy, tympanometry, and distortion product otoacoustic emissions tests at the first testing station. Individuals who fail any of these tests or have absent otoacoustic emissions at three of the six tested frequencies are referred to the second station for pure tone testing. For those with special needs, we usually conduct behavioral observation audiometry or play audiometry. At the end of the tests, we generate a list of individuals who need further audiological attention and make their needs known to their parents or guardians and their caregivers. If possible, our partnering organizations also provide follow-up services. We collaborated with audiologists, faculty, and students at National Women's League Foundation for the Hearing Impaired, Chung Shan Medical University, and National Kaohsiung Normal University in Taiwan in 2010; the University of Hong Kong Division of Speech and Hearing Sciences in 2011; the University of São Paulo in Bauru, Brazil, in 2012; and Beijing Hearing Society in 2013. Together we tested 670 children and adults with special needs, 66 older adults, 56 children in an orphanage, 69 children and adults who were HIV-positive or had AIDS, 54 adults living in three recreational drug rehabilitation cen-ters, and 850 students enrolled in primary to high schools in impoverished areas. Most populations we tested had higher rates of excessive earwax, hearing-related problems, and hearing loss, except for children in the orphanage and adults in the drug rehabilitation centers. ENDURING EFFECTS For professional exchange activities, we visited our partner organizations and different audiology facilities, such as hospitals, nonprofit organizations, private practices, and university audiology programs. We were very grateful for the opportunities to observe cochlear implant, rhinology, and cleft palate surgeries. Immersion opportunities are also scheduled for these action-packed trips. We toured landmarks as well as participated in cultural activities. Whenever possible, we used public transportation and tasted local cuisines. After returning to the United States, students made online scrapbooks with details of the experience. In addition, we published information on the hearing healthcare systems in the visited countries, brief descriptions of our trips, and results from our testing in professional magazines. Further, we analyzed the data and wrote manuscripts to be considered for publication in peer-reviewed journals. These publications serve to prolong the impact and endurance of our trips. The long-term goals of these efforts are to build up a large body of literature—along with other researchers in the field—and to facilitate better quality and more frequent hearing healthcare services for underserved populations around the world. We continue to collaborate with our previous partners in future missions and welcome their students. Chung Shan Medical University and University of São Paulo both have sent students to NIU for short-term academic exchange activities. We also plan to develop joint missions to other countries. Going forward, we will continue to form new allies and strengthen our ties with previous partners to form a worldwide web of university-based humanitarian programs. Acknowledgements We would like to thank our partners in Taiwan, Hong Kong, and Brazil, and our sponsors Oticon, Etymotic Research, and EBSCO for the generous help and support that make these trips possible. Audiology Without Borders Our Audiology Without Borders column, featured each month in the HJ eNewsletter, highlights humanitarian hearing healthcare programs. The column is edited by active humanitarians Jackie Clark, PhD, and King Chung, PhD. Dr. Clark is a clinical associate professor at the University of Texas at Dallas and a research scholar at University of the Witwatersrand in Johannesburg; and Dr. Chung is an associate professor of audiology at Northern Illinois University in DeKalb. Let us know about your humanitarian program! Send the details to [email protected] —manuscripts should be about 1,000 words, and photographs are also welcome (300 dpi in jpg, tif, or gif format). Read past Audiology Without Borders columns in a special collection at bit.ly/HJAudWB. Return to thehearingjournal.com
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,008 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,003 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,005 | 0,004 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,005 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,903 | 0,840 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».