MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2312402367 · doi:10.1097/acm.0b013e318201b68b

The History of Academic Medicine: A Notable Year

2010· editorial· en· W2312402367 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Steven L. Kanter

Notice bibliographique

RevueAcademic Medicine · 2010
Typeeditorial
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueHealth and Medical Research Impacts
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésContext (archaeology)Diversity (politics)Variety (cybernetics)Medical educationAlternative medicineMedicinePolitical scienceHistoryLawPathology

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

While the history of medicine is expertly chronicled in many excellent books and journals, much less has been written about the history of academic medicine. And yet, history is made every day at medical schools and teaching hospitals through new discoveries, through improved methods of patient care, and by the development of new and innovative approaches to educating the next generation of physicians and biomedical scientists. History is also made by how and why medical schools and teaching hospitals are born or die, affiliate with one another, and interface with society. These actions and events, studied within the context of the time and place in which they occurred, tell important stories, reveal critical lessons, and have the potential to inform current and future decision making. This year is noteworthy in the history of academic medicine because it marks the 100th anniversary of the publication of the Flexner Report. Academic Medicine devoted its entire February 2010 issue to a reexamination of this historic document through a variety of interesting lenses. Articles in that issue looked at the report from the perspectives of public health, diversity, generalist disciplines, liberal education, professionalism, social and community service, ethics and humanities, medical education in different parts of the world, key historical questions, and other crucial vantage points. In the spirit of creating as complete a record as possible of medical education in the United States and Canada 100 years after the Flexner Report, the journal published a supplement (to the September 2010 issue) that contains structured reports about the educational programs leading to the MD degree for almost every medical school in these two countries. (In the same spirit, the journal has invited each MD-degree-granting school in the United States and Canada that did not submit a structured report for the September supplement to submit one that will be posted online and linked to the supplement.) In addition, the supplement has six articles that take a historically-grounded look at where medical education is headed. In the November 2010 issue, the journal published additional articles and commentaries on Flexner, including the first in-depth examination of Henry Pritchett's introduction to the Flexner Report and a consideration of Flexner's contributions in the 49 years that he lived after the publication of his report. And that brings us to December. In this issue of the journal, you will find two articles and two commentaries that examine important events in the more recent history of academic medicine. In the two articles, John Kastor, MD, recounts and analyzes the circumstances surrounding the merger and subsequent de-merger of two of New York's outstanding academic health centers. And to expand and enrich our understanding of these articles, I invited the current leaders of these august institutions to reflect on what happened, to provide a sense of the current climate, and to share their visions for the future. I am grateful to Robert Grossman, MD, the Saul J. Farber Dean and CEO of NYU Langone Medical Center, and to Ken Davis, MD, the president and CEO of Mount Sinai Medical Center, who provide essential, first-person commentary of pivotal historical events involving their medical schools and teaching hospitals. Studying the history of academic medicine is important. In coming months, the journal will present more articles about historical events that have unfolded at medical schools and teaching hospitals. And I look forward to receiving new submissions from authors who ask penetrating questions, carry out cogent analyses, and produce new insights about historical events. It is this deeper, richer, and more comprehensive understanding of the past that will enable us to form a more sophisticated sense of the present and make the best decisions for the future. Steven L. Kanter, MD

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,005
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,013
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Éditorial · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,021
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,062

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0050,013
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,001
Bibliométrie0,0040,007
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0100,009
Communication savante0,0210,010
Science ouverte0,0020,008
Intégrité de la recherche0,0050,011
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0170,005

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,100
Tête enseignante GPT0,447
Écart entre enseignants0,348 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreÉditorial

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2010
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueAcademic MedicineMême sujetHealth and Medical Research ImpactsTravaux en français237 207