MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2312788593 · doi:10.1177/002070200906400424

Review: No Easy Fix

2009· article· en· W2312788593 sur OpenAlexaffabout
Mischa Evan Kaplan

Notice bibliographique

RevueInternational Journal Canada s Journal of Global Policy Analysis · 2009
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueGlobal Peace and Security Dynamics
Établissements canadiensUniversity of Toronto
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésResponsibility to protectSovereigntyHumanitarian interventionGenocideLegitimacyInternational communityLawState (computer science)Political scienceSkepticismHuman rightsCrimes against humanityIntervention (counseling)BlameInternational relationsSociologyInternational lawWar crimePolitics

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

NO EASY FIX Global Responses to Internal Wars and Crimes against Humanity Patricia Marchak Montreal and Kingston: McGill-Queen's University Press, 2008. 376pp, $34.95 cloth ISBN 978-0773533684Dealing with sovereign regimes that have perpetrated crimes against the human rights of their own citizens is a perennial problem for the international community, that nebulous and faceless force. Related to this issue, and perhaps the real crux ofthe problem, is the fact that countries remain at odds over the interrelated questions of state sovereignty and the legitimacy of foreign intervention. The American invasion of Iraq in 2003 - which the White House initially justified on the grounds of international security and, subsequently, by appealing to humanitarian considerations - raised exactly these concerns and demonstrated how elusive a global consensus on these issues remains. The ongoing conflict in Darfur poses similar problems. In western countries, public pressure for intervention to stop what many consider to be a genocide highlights the tension between state sovereignty and humanitarian principles. The Sudanese governmenf s refusal to recognize the authority ofthe International Criminal Court - which has attempted to bring to trial various members ofthe regime - casts doubt on the ability of international organizations to discharge their stated responsibilities.Patricia Marchak's book attempts to make sense of these issues. It is the valiant effort of a gifted and erudite scholar. If her conclusion is sobering, the blame hardly lies with her. The weight of her subject hangs heavily over every page. As Marchak herself admits, she is skeptical about the international community's ability to uphold an effective system of global justice. Humanitarian intervention, she notes, may be an idea whose time has arrived, but it has arrived in the context of a failing state system, and the one organization that has the moral authority to address the problems lacks the military capacity and the political will to do so (38). Concepts such as the responsibility to protect, a subject that forms the basis for one ofthe book's most convincing chapters, are, Marchak notes, often strong in sentiment but weak in execution. A further issue contributing to the author's doubts is the ability of international law - a western-centric and western-oriented concept - to develop into a legitimate and universally-accepted legal regime.But despite this skepticism, No Easy Fix avoids crass pessimism. Marchak has spent the last decade developing a solid reputation as a specialist in political ethics and its relation to state governance, and she is clearly aware of the implications of her subject. Her 2003 book Reigns of Terror examined various theoretical and historical approaches to cases involving state crimes against citizens, and argued for a theoretical connection between state systems and humanitarian crimes. The goal was to explain why states choose or are able to commit violent crimes against their own citizens.In many ways, Reigns of Terror is a prequel to No Easy Fix. While the former examined the mechanisms that allow state-sponsored violence to develop, the latter focuses on the repercussions of such violence, including the international community's attempts to bring justice to divided societies, the ability of these societies to come to terms with their legacies of violence, and the flaws inherent in the very concept of global justice. …

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,888
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,988

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,002
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,001
Bibliométrie0,0000,002
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,001
Science ouverte0,0010,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,008
Tête enseignante GPT0,342
Écart entre enseignants0,335 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations2
Publié2009
Routes d'admission2
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueInternational Journal Canada s Journal of Global Policy AnalysisMême sujetGlobal Peace and Security DynamicsTravaux en français237 207